Transport Strategy

South West Wales Bus Network - Have Your Say

Local Authorities in South West Wales and Transport for Wales are working together to propose some improvements to the bus network, in preparation for wider bus reform.

Transport for Wales want to hear from you to help refine their proposed local bus network ahead of it being introduced from 2027.

Bus Reform

Bus reform will mean that decisions about bus services in Wales (including routes, timetables, fares, hours of operation and service quality standard), will be made by Welsh Government and Transport for Wales. Transport for Wales will be working in partnership with local authorities and Corporate Joint Committees (CJCs). Bus operators can bid for contracts of various sizes to run services to agreed specifications.

Under bus reform, local authorities, Corporate Joint Committees, bus operators, Transport for Wales and the Welsh Government will all work together to design better bus networks and services delivered mainly through franchising. Within the funding available, they will prioritise services that best meet people’s and communities’ needs. Franchising brings together the strengths of private, municipal and community operators in efficient service delivery within a coordinated and planned public transport network. This change will benefit the people of Wales while accommodating local and regional needs and differences.

Survey

The online survey will aim to capture views, which will help refine our Proposed Base Network. However, there are ‘free text’ opportunities so that information can be provided on anything that matters to people about bus.

Have your say online now (opens in new tab)

Drop in sessions:

  • 21st July 09:00 - 17:00 HaverHub, Haverfordwest 
  • 5th September 09:00 - 17:00 HaverHub, Haverfordwest
ID: 13693, revised 03/07/2025
Print

On-demand community transport and taxi services in South West Wales

The South West Wales Regional Metro, with their consultants WSP, are conducting an in-depth analysis of 'on-demand' bus and taxi services within the South West Wales Region (Pembrokeshire, Carmarthenshire, Swansea and Neath Port Talbot).

This study aims to identify a set of recommendations for the upcoming Regional Transport Plan, to provide residents and visitors with a more integrated and improved demand responsive transport offer and to encourage taxi operators to continue to serve more deeply rural areas, outside of peak times. 

What is 'on-demand' transport?

'On-demand' transport can be defined as a flexible service which allows passengers to book their journey at a convenient time, from a designated pick-up point to a desired dropped off destination. This can include both demand responsive and community transport services which are defined as follows:

  • Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) is a shared transportation service which operate within a specified catchment area. These services adapt their routes and schedules to meet passenger demand. Currently within the region, both Fflecsi and Dial-a-Ride offer a DRT service within the region.
  • Community transport is a form of demand responsive transport but offers more community led solutions. Community Transport can include car sharing, taxi services as well as vehicular hire and Demand Responsive Transport provision. 

How to have your say

Drop-in sessions:

  • Tuesday 15 July, 3.00pm - 7.00pm - Letterston Memorial Hall, Station Road, Letterston, Haverfordwest SA62 5RY
  • Thursday 17 July, 3.00pm - 7.00pm - Crymych Arms Inn, Crymych, Pembrokeshire SA41 3RJ

Have your say online now (opens in a new tab)

Closing date: 11.59pm, Thursday 31 July 2025

 

 

ID: 13678, revised 04/07/2025
Print

The Draft Regional Transport Plan 2025 - 2030

April 2025:

This survey has now closed, thank you for your participation. 

The draft Regional Transport Plan has been prepared by the South West Wales Joint Corporate Committee (CJC), a newly established body for local government in the region. This plan outlines the strategic management and improvement of the transport network across Carmarthenshire, Neath Port Talbot, Pembrokeshire, and Swansea for the period 2025 - 2030. When completed, the new Regional Transport Plan will replace the existing Joint Local Transport Plan, drawn up in 2015.

The draft Regional Transport Plan aims to improve and manage the transport system to:

  • supporting economic growth.
  • encouraging a modal shift away from the use of private cars
  • reduce environmental impacts.

The Plan sets out commitments to:

  • making it easier to walk and cycle for local trips
  • improving buses and trains so that they are more attractive and convenient
  • improving links between different transport services
  • better management of our road network

Public consultation:

The CJC are currently undertaking a public consultation on the future of the transport network in South West Wales, to have your say please read the documents and complete the online survey (opens in a new tab).

This survey will close on 6th April 2025 at midnight.

Drop-in sessions have been arranged at the below locations where you are welcome to attend to discuss your views or concerns with this Authorities County Council Transport Strategy Team.

  • 3rd March 2025 Saundersfoot Coal Building, Saundersfoot Harbour 14:00 – 20:00
  • 5th March 2025 Pater Hall, Pembroke Dock, 10:00 – 14:00
  • 6th March 2025 St Davids City Hall, St Davids, 14:00 – 20:00
  • 10th March 2025 County Hall, Haverfordwest, 14:00 – 20:00

Reference copies of the documents and paper version of the feedback form will be made available at below local locations from 21st February 2025 please check local opening times.

  • Fishguard Library & Tourist Information Centre, Town Hall, Market Square, Fishguard, SA65 9HA
  • Milford Haven Library & Information Centre, Cedar Court, Havens Head Business Park, Milford Haven, SA73 3LS
  • Narberth Community Library, 3 Town Moor Mews, Narberth, SA67 7DF
  • Crymych Leisure Centre, Crymych, SA41 3QH
  • East Williamston Community Hall, East Williamston, Tenby, SA70 8RT

The final plan will be published in Summer 2025, following the relevant approvals. 

ID: 12728, revised 11/04/2025
Print

Pembroke Dock active travel improvements

Public consultation:

There is a further public drop in session being held at Pennar Community Hall on Monday 14th July 2025 4pm - 6pm

Pembrokeshire County Council’s Transport Strategy Team invites you to participate in an online survey aimed at gathering feedback from the public and commuters regarding the creation of shared use paths at the following locations:

  • High Street
  • Bush Street
  • Trinity Street
  • Prospect Place / Memorial Park

Why are we proposing these changes? 

This Authority is proposing to improve the existing active travel routes in Pembroke Dock which will include introducing new routes in line with the active travel guidance to encourage more walking, wheeling and cycling within the town with the vision of converting some footways in to shared use paths. It is our aim to create a safe environment for all and to encourage people to travel without the use of their vehicles. One of the primary objectives of this project is to improve connectivity between the lower part of town and the rest of the community, ensuring convenient access to local amenities and schools.

The public consultation will commence with a workshop/drop-in session on 24th June 2025, between 09:00 – 17:00 at the Pater Hall. 

The session will have representatives from Pembrokeshire County Council to answer any questions that may arise. Following this one-day event, for those who are unable to attend in person, an online public survey will be made available and can be accessed via Have your say 

The online survey will remain available for 5 weeks concluding on 28th July 2025 at midnight. 

Active travel improvements: Trinity Road and Community Centre Park, Pembroke Dock

Active travel improvements: Pembroke Dock

Active travel improvements: Bush St - Hight St - Prospect Place, Pembroke Dock

Hard copy plans are availble to view at County Hall from 24th June 2025.

Following on from the consultation period, final preferred option(s) will be identified. This preferred option will not be finalised until we have the feedback from the local community.

What is the scheme for?

This Authority is proposing to improve the existing active travel routes in Pembroke Dock which will include introducing new routes in line with the active travel guidance to encourage more walking, wheeling and cycling within the town with the vision of converting some footways in to shared use paths. It is our aim to create a safe environment for all and to encourage people to travel without the use of their vehicles. 

What is the scheme going to achieve?

Study work has already been undertaken with a review of the current network to ensure that the routes provide a connected and integrated solution for walkers, wheelers and cyclists wishing to access key locations within the town, whether this be for work, leisure or social purposes.

The ethos of the scheme is to provide a active travel network connecting the north of the town with the Secondary and new welsh medium school on the eastern section of High Street and Pembroke Road which is already served by an existing shared use path on this section of highway. The proposals also allow connection for those residing in the north of the town with a safe cycle network allowing access to Pembroke Community School sited immediately adjacent to the park and the doctors surgery in Argyle Street.

What are the main aims of the scheme?

  • Create a safe active travel link within the town
  • Improve the connectivity of the existing network
  • Improve road safety for walkers, wheelers and cyclists
  • Encourage socially inclusive active travel for all types of journeys including tourism and leisure
  • Reduce the levels of car dependency, reducing carbon footprint, pollution and congestion
  • Improve the environment, health and social wellbeing of the community

How will the scheme be paid for?

This Authority will submit a bid report under the Local Transport Capital Grant Fund to the Welsh Government for the financial year 2026/2027. This is match funded by Pembrokeshire County Council, up to 11%.

Will members of the public be consulted?

Yes, a formal public consultation process where members of the public can provide feedback on the scheme will be taking place in due course. This will be in the form of a workshop session displaying the proposed plans where representatives from Pembrokeshire County Councils transport section will be present to answer any questions that may arise.

How can I find out more information?

Our website will be updated accordingly as this proposal progresses.

Contact us:

For more information, please email: majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk
Tel: 01437 764551

ID: 12687, revised 10/07/2025
Print

Milford Haven Public Transport Interchange

What is the scheme for?

The Milford Haven Public Transport Interchange (MHPTI) scheme involves improvement works to the existing Milford Haven train station to create a new public transport interchange. This requires the relocation of the existing rail platform to allow for the provision of a new bus interchange, taxi rank, formalised car park, public realm spaces and improved Active Travel links. The platform relocation will also enable intercity services to and from London to use the station, in line with the Council’s and Transport for Wales’s long-term ambition to provide more regular rail services and better connectivity to more destinations.

What is the scheme going to achieve?

The proposed interchange will better facilitate integration of all transport modes with the aim to improve public transport services and promote active transport, therefore enhancing connectivity and accessibility for residents, businesses and visitors of the area. Furthermore, the high-quality facilities and public realm improvements delivered as part of this scheme will encourage visitors and local residents to enjoy the area, stimulate local economic growth by making Milford Haven a vibrant, attractive and safe place to be.

Why is there a need for the scheme?

The 2021 Census showed that approximately 42% of all households do not have access to vehicle or do not drive; meaning public transport plays an important role in the County’s mobility and connectivity. Specifically, 15% of all households do not own a car or van. This scheme will address the need to improve the public transport offering, integration and connectivity in Milford Haven and its environs in order to improve transport options for all.

What are the main aims of the scheme?

  • Provide a public transport interchange including a bus focal point and coach pick-up / drop-off point connected to the station
  • Provide an improved railway station
  • Improve passenger amenities, facilities and security at the station
  • Provision of a new car park with Electric Vehicle / Hydrogen charging facility and taxi rank
  • Improve built environment of station from a visual and landscape perspective
  • Improve accessibility to transport facilities and the town core areas
  • Improve Active Travel connectivity to the public transport interchange
  • Create sustainable access links within and between the town core areas.
  • Futureproof the railway by increasing patronage and supporting an enhanced railway service to Milford Haven (i.e. the London rail service)
  • Connect Local Communities
  • Limit the amount of environmental damage and emission from private vehicle usage, creating a greener way to travel.

How will the scheme be paid for?

This Authority has submitted a bid report under the Local Transport Capital Grant Fund to the Welsh Government for the financial year 2025/2026. This is match funded by PCC, up to 11%.

When will works commence and how long will it take to complete?

It is forecast that commencement of construction will be October 2025 with the expected completion being October 2026.

How can I find out more information?

Our website will be updated accordingly as this scheme progresses.

Contact us:

For more information, please email majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk
Tel: 01437 764551

ID: 12618, revised 28/01/2025
Print

Steynton to Old Bulford Road active travel improvements 2024

June 2025 update:

The online survey results hve now been analysed, the report can be found in the below link. If you have any questions please contact the team at majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk

 

Steynton to Old Bulford Road active travel consultation report

 

April 2025 update:

Following the public consultation process that concluded in February 2025, all comments received have been compiled into the table below, along with the Council's responses for ease of reference. We trust that this addresses the concerns raised; however, should you require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact the team via email.

Discussions are currently ongoing with the Authority's Engineering Team, the Local Councillor, and relevant stakeholders to determine which elements of the scheme will be taken forward subject to funding. This webpage will be updated accordingly.

The key themes addressed are as follows:

Category

Key themes (You said)

Council response (We said)
 Cycling I don't ride my bike to Milford Haven from Haverfordwest as I don't feel safe to ride especially with my children. We would ride lots of places if the infrastructure allowed us. The creation of a Shared Use Path aims to provide a safe environment for all users, away from busy roads. This initiative is part of our broader strategy to promote Active Travel within the County. Our plan includes upgrading existing infrastructure and identifying opportunities for new routes. By doing so, we can ensure that users can commute safely and enjoyably, encouraging more people to choose Active Travel options.
 Cycling The current cycle path around Johnston encourages dog fouling, anti-social behaviour and in recent extreme cases criminal activities. I would not allow my child to use it to get to school and home daily. It's crucial that we create a safe and clean environment for everyone, especially children. Community involvement and collaboration with Local Enforcement Authorities when these instances arise could also be key in addressing these problems.
 Parking The distance between Steynton and Tiers Cross / Johnston is quite far for people with reduced mobility. I imagine the Shared Use Path would be beneficial for health, leisure, commuting and wellbeing, however lack of parking at either end of the link may not make this route as popular as Neyland to Haverfordwest. The purpose of a Shared Use Path is to encourage users to commute, whether for leisure or work purposes, without relying on a vehicle. As such, parking is not a consideration for this path. However, off-street parking is available in Steynton, and there is a free Pembrokeshire County Council car park with disabled spaces located at Greenhall Park in Johnston.
 Parking Buses and trains are accessible and this Shared Use Path wouldn’t be used. While there is public transport available in the area, a Shared Use Path offers a flexible, traffic-free alternative that is ideal for leisure, exercise, and community activities. It also provides a greener, cost-effective way to travel for those who prefer to walk, wheel, or cycle. Survey results indicate that the creation of a Shared Use Path at this location would encourage more frequent walking, wheeling, and cycling.
 Shared Use Path The green route does not address the access issues from Johnston to Milford Haven. The Quietway (the green route) provides a path that prioritizes quieter, less trafficked backstreets, offering a more relaxed and accessible experience. Users will be directed along this route towards Tiers Cross and the existing Bulford Road Shared Use Path, until Phase 3 (indicated by the dashed red route) is completed, should the scheme proceed. Once Phase 3 is finished, this will create a direct link from Johnston to Milford Haven for users who prefer not to travel via Tiers Cross.
 Shared Use Path Many people with mobility issues have Disability paid cars and would not use the shared path. While some individuals with mobility issues may find it easier to commute using a vehicle, it is essential to ensure that the Shared Use Path is accessible to all users.
 Shared Use Path There needs to be provision for horse riders in this area. There are no linked safe off-road options. It's important to have safe, linked off-road routes for everyone, including those on horseback. This would not only help riders stay safe but also improve accessibility for all types of transport. A Multi-user Route could be looked into for a future scheme however in the meantime please visit our website https://www.pembrokeshire.gov.uk/definitive-map where you can view locations and download maps of bridleways within the County. 
 Shared Use Path I don't think it will warrant the amount of funding needed; I regularly walk the cycle tracks as a Johnston resident. I don't think it will get the footfall you expect due to the amount of people I see using them now which has dropped significantly after covid and lockdown. The Welsh Government will assess the costings as part of its decision-making process. As part of the evidence provided, monitoring data showing current user numbers will be included alongside survey results. These results suggest that the construction of a Shared Use Path at this location would encourage more frequent walking, wheeling, and cycling. Should the scheme proceed, additional monitoring will be conducted to determine if the project has achieved its objectives, particularly in terms of increasing Active Travel in the area.
 Shared Use Path Would this be shared with motorists? No, a Shared Use Path is designed to be used by pedestrians, wheelers and cyclists, and is typically physically separated from motor vehicular traffic. 
 Shared Use Path There is a large amount of cyclists who still use the road right next to a shared use path elsewhere in the county. A Shared Use Path is not just for the use of cyclists, it is also for the use of walkers and wheelers. Confident cyclists are still welcome to cycle on the carriageway should they wish to.
 Shared Use Path There is no interesting or beauty spots to view if walking.  While there may not be any notable beauty spots, this Shared Use Path would provide users with a convenient route for commuting to work or educational facilities, serving a practical purpose beyond just leisure activities.
 Shared Use Path Could cycle crossing warning signs be installed at the North end of the Shared Use Path? This can be investigated as part of the final design should the scheme go ahead.
 Shared Use Path What do you mean by a 'Quietway'?  The legislation / highway code allows for 'Quiet Lanes' to be designated with appropriate signage reminding drivers that other more vulnerable road users (such as cyclists, walkers, horse riders and mobility scooter users) may be found in the road on small rural roads.  In highway terms, a "Quietway" refers to a designated route, often a cycle path or pedestrian pathway, designed to minimize traffic noise and congestion, providing a more pleasant and safer environment for non-motorized travel
 Shared Use Path Please consider maintaining the height of the path as it crosses side roads. Journeys on the path from Steynton to Neyland are constantly interrupted by giving way to little-used side roads. Keeping the height of the path as it crosses would give priority to cyclists, and traffic-calm for vehicles crossing the path. Noted: and will be considered during design as appropriate.
 Shared Use Path The Shared Use Path would be a lot safer if it was on other side of hedge in Council owned farmland. Gradients could be improved and would be a lot cheaper to construct. The proposal for the Shared Use Path in Phase 3 is to place the route on the inside of the hedge, away from the Carriageway.
 Traffic I would strongly urge you to consider a reduced speed limit on the 'Quietway' section of road, where you are effectively putting cyclists (of all ages and abilities) in direct conflict with motorists using it as a short cut / rat run. There is an option under the Quiet Lanes legislation to implement a reduced speed limit as part of the designation process.  Noted, any changes to the existing speed limits will be in line with the Welsh Government Guidance.
 Traffic I would suggest that 20mph on Studdolph lane is not appropriate, but some thought needs to be given to some traffic calming provision or early warning around the Studdolph lane junction. In particular, vehicles turning off the A4076 onto Studdolph lane tend to carry a lot of speed off the 60mph carriageway on to the minor C Road. Noted, any changes to the existing speed limits will be in line with the Welsh Government Guidance.
 General I would strongly advise against the idea of building any sort of shared use path, cycle path, or non-vehicular transport route at this time, and in the current financial and geopolitical climate. The money should be used elsewhere. Investing in infrastructure like Shared Use Paths and cycle routes could have long-term benefits, such as promoting sustainable transport, reducing congestion, and supporting public health. Should funding be obtained for this scheme we are unable to use it elsewhere as the funds have been allocated for Active Travel purposes.
 General If it goes ahead, then perhaps within the school, we can encourage safer cycling and walking options. Our Road Safety Team regularly carry out safety talks in schools, there is no reason why this could not be done should the scheme go ahead. 
 General All cycle / walking paths are worthless without regular maintenance, thorns and punctures abound, there needs to be a maintenance schedule set in place. I've contacted the Council on numerous times about debris on the cycle routes, nothing is ever done, quite frankly , it will be a waste of money if a budget is not implemented for regular maintenance. Thank you for contacting the Council with your concerns over the maintenance of the cycle / walking paths, we will ensure that this is passed on to the Maintenance Team.
 General This path would worry me, as I believe the free school transport would end for the children who attend the catchment secondary school. This proposed scheme is to increase the number of Active Travel commutes, it is not intended to replace any public school transport arrangements. 
 General What about a footpath/cycle path from Waterston to Sentry Cross Roundabout to connect to the footpaths there heading to Milford Haven & Neyland. This could be investigated for a future scheme and subject to funding.

 

March 2025 update:

The consultation period has now ended. The results of the on-line survey are currently being analysed along with the feedback obtained at the public consultation day which took place on the 14th February 2025. This webpage will be updated in due course confirming if the proposals will be taken forward.

Public consultation

Pembrokeshire County Councils Transport Strategy Team invite you to take part in this online survey which aims to gather feedback from members of the public and commuters on the following:

  • Construction of a segregated Shared Use Path which forms a connection between Steynton and Johnston, along the A4076. This is a partial joint project between Pembrokeshire County Council and South Wales Trunk Road Agency. 
  • Phase 1 (Red solid line) forms a Shared Use Path along the A4076 starting opposite the bus stop at St Peters Church and linking Northwards towards the C3024 (the Old Bulford Road towards Tiers Cross diverges). This work will be undertaken by Pembrokeshire County Council.
  • Phase 2 (Blue solid line) consists of a Shared Use Path formation, junction and footway improvements between the Neyland Road junction Northwards along the A4076 to connect in with Phase 1, this work will be undertaken by South Wales Trunk Road Agency. Users will then be directed along the quiteway towards Tiers Cross and the existing Bulford Road Shared Use Path, until Phase 3 is completed.
  • Phase 3 (red dashed line) this future route will form the remaining part of the Shared Use Path, between Phase 2 and Sunnycroft Roundabout (A4076). This work is expected to commence with future years funding.

Why are we proposing these changes?

There is no direct Active Travel link between Johnston and Milford Haven, despite this being one of the most used commuter routes in Pembrokeshire. At present, residents can not cycle/walk safely between the two areas. The wider strategy (Phase 1 and 3) is to provide a Shared Use Path along the A4076 between the two areas. This would then connect to the existing network between Johnston and Haverfordwest.

The village of Steynton lies to the north of Milford Haven and has properties situated on either side of the main road. There is provision for a new footway to both sides of the village, however, the footway to the western side is generally wider with a grass verge and would be better suited for a Shared Use Path rather than the eastern side which has a steep cross fall. The footway is not continuous and there is no cycle route provision which is segregated from the carriageway. The implementation of this scheme would provide missing links within the Active Travel Network.

The aim of the proposals is to:

  • Facilitate and increase the number of Active Travel journeys between Milford Haven and Johnston
  • To provide a safe access away from the A4076 Trunk Road
  • Increase physical activity and encourage a healthy lifestyle
  • Support climate change and decarbonisation by reducing vehicle trips
  • Give the local community the opportunity to travel via Active Travel means

Public consultation

We will be seeking your feedback on the proposed designs.

Studdolph active travel improvements

Phase 1-2 Studdolph Active travel improvements

Steynton to Studdolph Lane shared use path

 

The Public consultation will commence with a workshop/drop-in session on 14th February 2025, between 10:00 – 12:00, 13:00 – 16:00 and 18:30 – 20:00 at Steynton Community Hall.

The sessions will have representatives from Pembrokeshire County Council to answer any questions that may arise. Following this one-day event, for those who are unable to attend in person, an online public survey will be made available and can be accessed, via: Have your say

The online survey will remain available for 6 weeks concluding on 28th March 2025 at midnight.

Whilst the County Council encourages consultation responses to be made via our on-line consultation system, paper copies of the designs and survey, along with a comments box, will be located in County Hall. Posted copies are available upon request by contacting the team on the below email address or contact number.

Following on from the consultation period, final preferred option(s) will be identified. This preferred option will not be finalised until we have the feedback from the local community.

Please contact the team at majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk or telephone 01437 764551 if you have any questions.

This online survey will close on 28th March 2025 at midnight. Thank you for your time in completing this survey.

ID: 12221, revised 25/06/2025
Print

Penwallis Bus Priority

April 2025 Update:

Following the public consultation process that concluded in November 2024, all comments received have been compiled into the table below, along with the Council's responses for ease of reference. We trust that this addresses the concerns raised; however, should you require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact the team via email.

Discussions are currently ongoing with the Authority's Engineering Team, the Local Councillor, and relevant stakeholders to determine which elements of the scheme will be taken forward subject to funding. This webpage will be updated accordingly. 

The key themes addressed are as follows:

Category

Key Themes (You Said)

Council Response (We Said)
Road Safety The bollards were installed to prevent unwanted traffic from the adjoining estates, as before their installation, the road was frequently used by 'boy racers' driving at dangerous speeds, creating an unsafe environment. The removal of these dead ends would lead to a 'rat run,' which would decrease road safety, particularly for children who play in the street. It's important to consider the long-term safety of residents when making changes to the infrastructure. One of the options presented in the public consultation proposes a route exclusively for buses, with the installation of an access-controlled gate. This gate would only be used by buses and emergency services, ensuring that no 'rat run' is created within this scheme.
Parking I am concerned about the potential damage to cars parked on the street, many vehicles including my own are parked outside our homes and to have large buses and other vehicles using the street that can already be busy with resident vehicles will find it difficult to navigate through. We acknowledge your concerns regarding the impact of larger vehicles, such as buses, navigating streets where residents park, especially for those who rely on street parking outside their homes. Under the proposed bus priority route, only buses would be permitted to use the designated lane, and access would be controlled via a barrier. This barrier would either be operated by bus drivers using an access card or through a number plate registration system. Should the scheme proceed, only four buses per day would utilise this new route. Additionally, emergency services would have access to the route when necessary. 
Parking Carers and family members who visit vulnerable residents on Bryn Llewellyn and Heol Glyndwr often park on the street, the new parking restrictions would create significant difficulties for them. Thank you for your concern. We understand that the new parking restrictions may create challenges for carers and family members visiting vulnerable residents on Bryn Llewellyn and Heol Glyndwr. We are committed to finding a solution that ensures the safety and accessibility of the area while balancing the needs of the Community. We will be looking into possible alternatives or accommodations to ease the impact on those who need to visit regularly.
Parking Taking away parking would de-value the prices of property. Noted; we understand that parking is an important factor in the value of properties in the area. Improved bus routes can increase accessibility, reducing commute times and making areas more desirable, which can lead to higher demand and subsequently, higher property values. 
Parking If the parked horse boxes and unused cars were removed from Dan y Bryn, then the need for this proposal would not be required. Generally, horse boxes should not be kept on the highway. We will liaise with our Parking Enforcement Team regarding this matter. If the unused vehicles are not taxed, it is against the law to keep them on the Public Highway. Untaxed vehicles should be reported to the DVLA, as this Authority does not have the power to remove them.
Parking If implemented, where would we, as local residents, park? The proposal would require us to give up our parking spaces in order to reopen the area. No official parking areas would be removed. 
Parking Double yellow lines are proposed for Bryn Llewellyn, where residents rely on on-street parking for personal and work vehicles, with no alternative parking options nearby. Subject to the Traffic Regulation Order, double yellow lines are proposed in order to prevent cars parking in the vicinity of the bus gate to allow easy passage with no obstructions. 
Public Transport There are several bus stops conveniently located nearby, offering easy access for all residents without disrupting our Community. The potential drawbacks of introducing a bus route far outweigh any perceived benefits. It would negatively impact our quality of life and pose a risk to the safety of our children. The current bus route does not fully serve the Penwallis area, limiting access for residents, particularly those with limited mobility. This proposal aims to extend the bus route to better serve this Community, providing greater accessibility for individuals who may struggle to reach other bus stops. The proposed route would only make 4 daily trips.
At present, the bus is required to turn around in Heol Glyndwr, a manoeuvre that poses potential risks to road safety. By eliminating this reversing manoeuvre, the proposal will contribute to safer traffic flow and reduce the likelihood of accidents or incidents caused by this turning action.
 Public Transport I am concerned that the bus gate would not be maintained by opening it up to all traffic. As part of the bidding process, maintenance will need to be included in order to secure funding from the Welsh Government. The proposed bus gate is not intended for use by all traffic; it will be specifically designated for the use of the bus service and emergency services only.
Public Transport  It feels as though other residents public transport requests are being taken into consideration far above the residents of Bryn Llywelyn and Heol Caradog of whom this is will actually affect in day-to-day life. This Authority is investigating the re-routing scheme in response to requests for the 410 town bus service to be extended to cover Penwallis and the surrounding areas. It is essential that all members of the Community have access to local public transport within their respective areas.
Public Transport The bus route could easily be facilitated without removal of the bollards. Without the removal of the bollards the current but route in unable to serve the Penwallis area. At present, the bus is required to turn around in Heol Glyndwr, a manoeuvre that poses potential risks to road safety. By eliminating this reversing manoeuvre, the proposal will contribute to safer traffic flow and reduce the likelihood of accidents or incidents caused by this turning action.
Public Transport I am unlikely to ever need to travel to/from the Penwallis area. However, since the 410 bus route also links Fishguard with Goodwick and Fishguard Harbour (sections of the route which I do use occasionally) there may be knock-on effects to the timing and/or frequency of buses on those sections. If so, that could encourage me to make more use of that part of the 410 service. Should the proposal go ahead, the timetable will need to be adjusted to accommodate the re-route and the additional bus stop. However, it is not anticipated that there will be a significant change in the overall travel time.
Public Transport Are you going to enforce this on other estates where the bus has to turn around?  At present, we are only focusing on the Penwallis area. Further investigation into improving the route, particularly where the bus has to turn around at other locations, could be considered under future funding.
Public Transport Why can’t the bus not go up Dan y Bryn as it is now, without any changes, and do the same up the Wallis Hill with no additional money being spent. Improvements are being considered to create a safer and more user-friendly service. 
Public Transport The proposal barrier system will not work it will only get damaged/vandalised.  We understand there may be concerns about the risk of vandalism to the barrier and we will investigate the potential for CCTV or other measures to be included in the scheme.
Public Transport We have managed without this bus route for all of these years, what has changed why do we need it now?  Encouraging the use of public transport, such as buses, is essential for a more sustainable and equitable future. By reducing reliance on private cars, we can address several pressing issues like carbon emissions, traffic congestion, and the financial burden of owning and maintaining a vehicle. Plus, public transport offers numerous health benefits, such as reducing air pollution and encouraging Active Travel. In the case of Fishguard and Goodwick, the 17.3% (2021 Census) of residents without access to a private vehicle highlight how crucial public transport is for providing mobility to those who might otherwise be isolated. Public transport also ensures greater accessibility, allowing people from all backgrounds, regardless of income or physical ability, to get around easily.
Public Transport I am doubtful that this scheme will increase passenger numbers by more than a handful for some journeys, at best, given that the close proximity to the Town means that for many, walking into Town is such a short journey, that the bus trip is barely worth it, and the number of convenient services limited.  A face-to-face consultation was conducted on the bus to obtain feedback from passengers, 25% of respondents believe the proposed re-routing and addition of a bus stop will positively impact their journey, showing that there is support for improving accessibility and convenience for passengers. This proposal aims to extend the bus route to better serve this Community, providing greater accessibility for individuals who may struggle to reach other bus stops.
Public Transport Why could you not just use a smaller bus? The 410 bus service currently accommodates around 130 passenger journeys per day on average. Extending the route to cover the Penwallis area is expected to attract more users. Therefore, a smaller vehicle would not be sufficient to accommodate the increased demand.
Public Transport I see empty buses in Fishguard. During the Public Consultation process 20% of respondents would be more likely to use the bus more frequently if the proposal was implemented, this shows that extending the bus route and adding an additional stop could potentially increase passenger numbers, further enhancing the benefits of public transport in the area. Further consultation was conducted face-to-face on the bus showing that  80% of passengers use the bus daily. This is an important insight, as it highlights that a large portion of the Community already relies on the bus service regularly. For these passengers, improving accessibility and convenience through route extensions and additional stops could help make their daily commutes even easier.
Public Transport Most people drive, so I fail to see how this upheaval is justified for what seems like minimal, if any, increase in bus service usage. In the case of Fishguard and Goodwick, 17.3% of residents do not have access to a private vehicle (2021 Census). This highlights how crucial public transport is for providing mobility to those who might otherwise be isolated. Public transport also ensures greater accessibility, allowing people from all backgrounds, regardless of income or physical ability, to get around easily.
Congestion The S-bend from Bryn Llewelyn leading to Heol Caradog is already a narrow and challenging corner, which makes me believe that the resulting congestion and issues will be significant. A swept path assessment will be conducted to ensure there is adequate space for a bus to manoeuvre without causing any congestion.
Congestion Why would you want to make the quietest street in Fishguard a 24/7 traffic jam. With only four additional bus trips per day, the re-routing should have a minimal impact on traffic congestion. 
Congestion Residents, including myself, park outside our homes, and the added congestion from buses and people using our street as a shortcut will lead to both damage and increased hostility. Under the proposed bus priority route, only buses would be permitted to use the designated lane, and access would be controlled via a barrier. This barrier would either be operated by bus drivers using an access card or through a number plate registration system. Should the scheme proceed, only four buses per day would utilise this new route. Additionally, emergency services would have access to the route when necessary. Therefore, the re-routing should have minimal impact on traffic congestion. 
Congestion This proposal offers no benefits; instead, it will lead to increased traffic, noise, and pollution. Encouraging the use of public transport, such as buses, is essential for a more sustainable and equitable future. By reducing reliance on private cars, we can address several pressing issues like carbon emissions, traffic congestion, and the financial burden of owning and maintaining a vehicle. Plus, public transport offers numerous health benefits, such as reducing air pollution and encouraging Active Travel.
Traffic Opening up Heol Caradog and Bryn Llewellyn to through traffic would likely attract a variety of vehicles, including farm vehicles and tractors, as a shortcut between Llanychaer and Scleddau. Farmers often work unsociable hours, which means that heavy machinery and tractors could be using these streets at early or late hours, adding to noise disturbances and further disrupting the residential environment. The increase traffic would add wear and tear to roads not built for frequent heavy machinery. One of the options presented in the public consultation proposes a route exclusively for buses, with the installation of an access-controlled gate. This gate would only be used by buses and emergency services, not intended to be used by large agricultural vehicles.
Traffic Various forms of transport manage to deliver in the area e.g. Supermarket deliveries, refuse collections turning very easily.  Other vehicles may be able to turn easily, we believe it's important to consider the safety of all road users. Allowing a bus to continue to manoeuvre in this way could potentially create hazards, especially for pedestrians and smaller vehicles. Finding a solution that mitigates the risks posed by such large vehicles turning, ensuring the overall safety of the road for everyone.
General How will widening the road work with houses on either side? Do you plan on removing the pavement altogether? There is no requirement to eliminate any adjacent footways. 
General With these proposals residents are again going to have to put up with needless reckless behaviour how is this a good idea? We assume that you are referring to people using the proposal as a "rat run". Under the proposed bus priority route, only buses would be permitted to use the designated lane, and access would be controlled via a barrier. This barrier would either be operated by bus drivers using an access card or through a number plate registration system. Additionally, emergency services will also have access to the route when necessary. 
General The introduction of a bus route will likely diminish the value of properties along Heol Caradog, Bryn Llewellyn, and surrounding areas. People who move to this part of Fishguard often do so because of the quieter, family-friendly environment. The change in the nature of these streets could dissuade future buyers and reduce the attractiveness of the area, resulting in financial consequences for existing homeowners.  Noted; Improved bus routes can increase accessibility, reducing commute times and making areas more desirable, which can lead to higher demand and subsequently, higher property values. 
General There are lots of potholes in these two estate roads to which we have reported on several occasions and nothing has been done.  Noted; this will be passed on to Area Maintenance for their attention. 
General Residents in the lower properties have driveways they always need access to, is this convenient for them? Or are they to be inconvenienced for what most people think of as a ridiculous idea anyway. No part of the proposal would close up or cause obstruction to residents driveways. 
General Children play outside on the grass verge, widening the road will ensure that the kids cannot play outside and with nothing else to do in the street, how do you expect the kids to play outside in a safe environment? Your concerns are noted about the safety and well-being of children who play outside. It’s crucial that we consider the impact of any changes on the Community, especially when it comes to providing safe spaces for children.
General We have suffered damage to our property and cars, with the proposal it will only be worse. If this happens again, we will pursuing the Council with a legal claim.  We completely understand the frustration and concern regarding the damage to your property and vehicles. It's essential that your safety and the protection of your property are taken seriously. Should the scheme go ahead, and any damage occur to your vehicles or property as a result of the bus, you would be well within your rights to file an official complaint with the Council.
General Should this proposal go ahead would get a reduction in our Council Tax? Should this scheme move forward then it will be an improvement to public transport services in the area and will have no direct impact on Council Tax. The band your property is in is based on the market value of your property as from 1st April 2003. This will not change as the result of this bus priority measure going ahead. 
General Heol Caradog and the surrounding area is home to green space and wildlife, this will be disturbed by the construction works and increased traffic generated with this proposal.  Should the scheme go ahead a full Ecological survey will be carried out, we are also in consultation with this Authorities Bio-diversity Team who will advise accordingly. 
General My house has a wall that you can only look over with a high vehicle (like a bus) so me, and my family’s privacy will be disturbed. Noted; we completely understand your concern about the privacy of you and your family. It’s important to feel secure and private in your own home. The re-routing of the bus would only pass four times a day.
General Both Heol Caradog and Bryn Llewellyn are small, peaceful and tight knit communities, running buses through them will irrevocably change that for those of us who have made these communities our homes. - Bryn Llewellyn and Heol Glyndwrs dead ends provide places for the children of these communities to be able to play together without fear of traffic. They provide a quiet meeting point for the older residents to stand and talk as well as a green space for the residents of the retirement cottages to look out onto.  Your concerns are noted about the safety and well-being of children who play outside. It’s crucial that we consider the impact of any changes on the Community, especially when it comes to providing safe spaces for children. The re-routing of the bus would only pass four times a day.
General The idea of a bus getting up somewhere as steep as Bryn Llewellyn and round the corner at the top without hitting numerous other vehicles several times a week is not possible.  The geometry of the Public Highway would always be assessed, and measures taken to ensure that access along any nominated route is achievable. 

 

December 2024 Update:

The consultation period has now ended. The results of the online survey are currently being analysed together with all the feedback received. This web page will be updated in due course confirming whether the proposals will be developed.

Public Consultation

Pembrokeshire County Councils Transport Strategy Team invite you to take part in this on-line survey which aims to gather feedback from members of the public and commuters on the following:

  • Open up the current dead-ends on Heol Caradog to Dan y Bryn and Heol Glyndwr.
  • Re-route Bus No. 410 to follow Heol Preseli, Penwallis, Heol Caradog, Dan y Bryn to serve bus stop on Heol Glyndwr.

Why are we proposing these changes? 

The existing bus route around Penwallis is inefficient. The road layout consists of two dead-ends, which requires Bus 410 to then reverse and change direction in the middle of its route, near Heol Glyndwr, leaving insufficient time to serve Penwallis.

The proposals include opening up the current dead-ends on Heol Caradog to Dan y Bryn and Heol Glyndwr.  This would improve service for Bus 410. The proposed route would follow Heol Preseli, a right turn onto Penwallis, left turn into Heol Caradog and then into Dan y Bryn to serve the bus stop on Heol Glyndwr.

The aim of the proposal is to:

  • Improve bus connectivity within the estate
  • Increase accessibility and facilities for people with limited mobility and with few or no facilities for public transport passengers
  • Improve bus journey times
  • Offer a valuable alternative to walking and/or for those who would typically use a vehicle or private hire
  • Improve road safety
  • Improve the overall air quality and reducing the carbon footprint, contributing to a healthier Wales by encouraging people to leave their vehicles at home

The proposed plans are available to view, hard copies are at available County Hall.

Option 1 - Bryn Llewllyn - one way system - bus priority Penwallis

Option 2 - Bryn Llewllyn one way system with access control - bus priority Penwallis

Option 1 - Heol Caradog one way system - bus priority Penwallis

Option 2 - Heol Caradog bus gate - bus priority Penwallis

Penwallis bus routing scheme reverse route

Penwallis bus current route improvements

Penwallis bus routing scheme - Plans

Penwallis bus stop - bus priority

 

An online public survey will be made available and can be accessed, via: Have your say and will remain available for 4 weeks, concluding on 29th November 2024.  

Whilst the County Council encourages consultation responses to be made via our on-line consultation system, paper hardcopies of the designs and survey, along with a comments box, will be located in County Hall. The printed version and paper surveys will remain in place until 29th November 2024, where they will be collected. Posted copies are available upon request by contacting the team on the below email address or contact number.

Please contact the team at majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk or telephone 01437 76455 if you have any questions.

This on-line survey will close on 29th November 2024 at midnight. Thank you for your time in completing this survey.

Why can’t the bus not go up Dan y Bryn as it is now, without any changes, and do the same up the Wallis Hill with no additional money being spent.

ID: 12128, revised 23/04/2025
Print

St Dogmaels active travel and connectivity improvements

June 2025 update:

The online survey results have now been analysed, the report can be found in the below link. If you have any questions please contact the team at majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk 

 

St Dogmaels Active Travel Consultation Report

 

April 2025 update:

Following the public consultation process that concluded in November 2024, all comments received have been compiled into the table below, along with the Council's responses for ease of reference. We trust that this addresses the concerns raised; however, should you require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact the team via email. 

Discussions are currently ongoing with the Authority's Engineering Team, the Local Councillor, and relevant stakeholders to determine which elements of the scheme will be taken forward subject to funding. This webpage will be updated accordingly. 

The key themes addressed are as follows:

Category

Key themes (you said)

Council response (we said)
Traffic The current High Street traffic system is fine as it is, the road is wide enough for two vehicles coming from opposite directions to pass one another. Should the proposals go ahead the congestion would be devastating to the entire village and a gridlock would be a regular occurrence. Current Traffic Regulation Orders are being retained, with any future alterations developed to ensure traffic can pass each other within sections of Highway where carriageway widths are sufficient.
Traffic Consider the vital services that rely on our roads, first responders, fire engines, ambulances, the police, and especially the RNLI. In emergencies, when every second counts, the inability of vehicles to manoeuvre effectively could cost lives. There is no anticipated impact upon Emergency Services and/or First Responders associated with the proposed scheme.
Traffic No consideration has been given for disabled access or people with limited mobility. Full consideration is given to all users in line with Active Travel Guidance.
Traffic There is no plan for Pilot Street (the priority for residents) which will become even more dangerous if pedestrians are diverted to that route whilst the purple route is completed. Pilot Street should be addressed prior to any other works not dismissed as 'too difficult'! No plans were produced for Pilot Street as we wanted to gain feedback from the residents as to what the issues are and how they can be addressed. 
Parking Making the car park pay & display causes visitors to park in and around the village as they do not want to pay for parking. The scheme has not proposed any parking charges or amendments to the current car park arrangements.
Pedestrian It is very clear from the documents and pictures that a big contributing factor regarding vehicle/pedestrian flow in the ward is parking. Is there a plan to address this? The village has a unique and historic layout, as with all villages of this type vehicles were not factors when this was developed, therefore this results in any changes having to fully consider the Highway space available, within St Dogmaels the arrangement of carriageway and on- street parking has been developed over several years of monitoring, any changes to the current arrangements would be resisted, from the initially developed plans the engineers have considered how the current arrangements work, from manoeuvring along the section of carriageway, vehicle passing opportunities, parking, and pedestrian requirement. The initial plan developed therefore retains the current arrangements in essence, whilst consideration to areas of the highway which could be reassigned to create pedestrian facilities.  
Pedestrian Not everyone who goes to the beach is able bodied and fit to walk 2 miles from the village, this proposal is no good to the disabled at all. The current infrastructure within St Dogmaels is substandard for the majority of pedestrians and those with mobility needs. The proposed Shared Use Path would provide a safe alternative for Active Travel. For those who may wish to, or are unable to walk longer distances, there is the option of the 408 bus service and Fflecsi Bus service. 
Shared Use Path The proposal will not encourage more people to walk/cycle. The survey results indicate that 46% of participants would be encouraged to walk and cycle more frequently and agree that the proposed improves accessibility for people with mobility needs. 
Shared Use Path Why not create a 'shared surface' from the bottom of the High Street (where the boardwalk begins) and continue it up to where you have shown it terminating at Fiedr Fawr? The proposal will create a Shared Use Path in phases from St Dogmaels to Poppit Sands upon completion. Further investigations towards Cardigan in the opposite direction could be looked at in the future.
Shared Use Path A shared pathway with pedestrians and bikes will be hazardous to pedestrians, the bikes will take over.  Respect is required by all users of various modes; shared facilities are shared. Additional signage 'Care Share' can be implemented along the route.
Shared Use Path A shared use path must be accessible for a wheelchair user but people with hearing impairment generally do not like shared use paths as they cannot hear bikes. All users of a Shared Use Path are required to respect other modes and interact accordingly, as they would on any other public highway.
Shared Use Path Shared use paths need to be wide to work properly. The scheme has been produced in line with guidance from Manual for Streets and the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges Guidelines. Departures from standard widths are permitted within local variation depending on the surrounding environment.
Shared Use Path Shared use depends on the courtesy of other users. Example - The pedestrians who walk from Cardigan to The Wildlife Centre / Cilgerran share the route with cyclists and this can be a source of aggravation as cyclists seem to have adopted the idea that speed gives them priority. Respect is required by all users of various modes; shared facilities are shared. Additional signage 'Care Share' can be implemented along the route.
Shared Use Path The junctions of entering and exiting any shared use path back onto the busy road to Poppit or the busy High Street. These need to be very well designed for full visibility for anyone sight impaired, hearing impaired, using a wheelchair or young people so they can be fully seen as well as being able to fully see all angles. Currently all similar junctions into or out of footpaths are terrible for visibility and safety onto roads where drivers do not keep to the 20mph limit.   The scheme has been produced in line with guidance from Manual for Streets and Design Manual for Roads and Bridges Guidelines. Advanced signing of pedestrians/cyclists in the vicinity can be implemented to warn motorists of movement in the area.
Shared Use Path I really welcome PCC's efforts here, which has long been needed and now that the traffic situation in St Dogmaels is worsening. But sorry to say that neither of these routes is satisfactory for 'shared use' - pedestrian & cyclist. Both routes have two values - for movement around the north of the village, and as routes to Poppit, Cippyn, Cemaes for both locals and visitors. The routes are designed to Active Travel guidance and will facilitate Active Travel and pedestrian movement between St Dogmaels and Poppit Sands. They will also provide safer routes, away from vehicles, for locals and visitors to move within the area.
Shared Use Path St Dogmaels has an ageing population who do not or cannot ride bikes. Active Travel and the use of a Shared Use Path is for all ages and the future generations. The Shared Use Path is also welcomed to be used by visitors and those who may wish to ride, but do not currently due to a lack of infrastructure.
Shared Use Path With narrower spaces for vehicles and pedestrians, we may inadvertently create hazardous situations as cyclists become apprehensive about navigating through the area, which could lead to accidents. Any narrowing within the carriageway will be to Active Travel guidance, they are narrowed in order to avoid conflict. This also slows traffic and enhances the awareness of drivers, making more vulnerable users have higher priority.
Shared Use Path Will PCC have to change legislation to allow cycling on footpaths? This is not a footpath it is a Shared Use Path therefore no legislation will need to be changed as cycling will be welcomed. 
Public Transport The Poppit Rocket has been stopped, Fflecsi bus is confusing, car transport seems to be the only option in Rural Pembrokeshire. Public Transport within Pembrokeshire does need further improvements; the current Bus Reform and Bus Franchising is underway as part of Welsh Government and Transport for Wales future programmes, this will seek to address the gaps in service. Currently, there is the local 408 bus and Fflecsi Bus in the area. 
Congestion This would cause disruption whilst the work is taking place causing problems, especially for those who live at Poppit and have to use the village route every day. A full risk assessment would be carried out before any construction works commence in order to minimise any disruption. This Authority typically adheres to working outside peak tourist season times (i.e. Easter, school holidays) where congestion on the network is typically higher.
Congestion Currently, traffic naturally forms priority flow in both directions. I believe that enforcing traffic to 'stop' in certain places would create more problems with it building-up. A formal priority system would only be installed where it is deemed necessary; the current plans demonstrated an option for consideration only at a feasibility level. Comments relating to traffic flow will be considered within any final designs.
Congestion The environmental implications of increased congestion should also weigh heavily in your decision-making process. A rise in vehicle emissions due to traffic jams can negatively impact the health of our residents who deserve the freedom to enjoy fresh air in their homes. A full environmental impact assessment would be carried out before any construction works commence. However, the scheme itself is not anticipated to directly increase traffic flow in the area.
Red Route - Phase 1 Broadwalk How can the red route (Boardwalk) be made sufficiently wide without destroying a lot of adjacent trees, plus major engineering works will be needed to create the cantilevered path described. A full environmental impact assessment would be carried out before any construction works commence. There is also the 3:1 planting requirement where the Woodland Trust recommends planting at least three trees for every one felled, or as specified in the felling license. 
Red Route - Phase 1 Broadwalk It would be very sad if the boardwalk was installed, and the materials didn’t last very long. We will assess the lifespan of materials, appropriate for the area, and determine what will be suitable during a detailed design phase.
Red Route - Phase 1 Broadwalk The Graig footpath serves a very important role in the community without imposing too much on the natural landscape.  I fear that increasing the demand on this path and the 3 meter cantilever suggested would change the landscape altogether and enter Pilot Street at a traffic pinch point. The ideal would be to keep the Graig as it is, a narrow pedestrian path, and keep it maintained against erosion as it can be without too much intrusion. This would take some of the pressure off the High Street, providing a by-pass for pedestrian footfall such as school children, dog walkers, commuters and coastal path walkers. The erosion of the current route by the River Teifi is undermining the stability of the bank and access to the route will no longer be possible without an intervention. The proposed cantilever route will 'float' above the bank and allow for minimal disturbance to natural patterns. The proposed route would ensure the long-term viability of the Graig.
Red Route - Phase 1 Broadwalk The raised ramp will potentially flood houses. A full risk assessment would be carried out before any construction work in order to assess any drainage / potential flood issues. 
Red Route - Phase 1 Broadwalk The proposals will destabilise the cliff and we will lose the Graig as a Footpath forever, despite it being the only safe route from the middle of St Dogmaels for pedestrians heading to the North end of the village or walking the Wales Coastal Path. The erosion of the current route by the River Teifi is undermining the stability of the bank and access to the route will no longer be possible without an intervention. The proposed cantilever route will 'float' above the bank and allow for minimal disturbance to natural patterns. The proposed route would ensure the long-term viability of the Graig. Geological investigations to date have confirmed that the bank is suitable to carry the load of the proposed boardwalk.
Red Route - Phase 1 Broadwalk At the North end of the Graig footpath there is 18 metres between walls most of which is less than 1.3 m wide and does not comply with Active Travel Act Guidance. This 18m section between the walls is too narrow for a push bike and pedestrian to pass. (Active Travel Act Guidance Section 9.6.4 Pedestrian routes should have a clear unobstructed width of 2.0m (desirable minimum), which allows two wheelchair users to pass one other. Where physical constraints make this impossible a clear width of 1.5m (absolute minimum) should be maintained to enable a wheelchair user and walking companion to travel side by side.)  While the overall scheme has been designed in accordance with Active Travel Guidance; departures from the minimum widths are permitted in areas of local variation. In order to provide a clear start/end point to the route - the north end of the Graig has been identified. It is substandard in width now, and people are using it to travel this route; within the proposed scheme - riders may be asked to dismount and all users are expected to behave accordingly and respect all other users.
Purple Route - Phase 2 Village It is so narrow that if a bike comes out of the Graig path onto Pilot Street even if it is being pushed there is not enough space for a pedestrian to squeeze past. Pedestrians will have to get out of the bike’s way and step backwards into the road – risking their lives. Respect is required by all users of various modes; shared facilities are shared. Additional signage 'Care Share' can be implemented along the route.
Purple Route - Phase 2 Village During the summer months the tourism traffic is very heavy as it is, the probable bottlenecks created by this proposed scheme will only create more congestion. The Current Traffic Regulation Orders are being retained, with any future alterations developed to ensure traffic can pass each other within sections of Highway where carriageway widths are sufficient.
Purple Route - Phase 2 Village This will obstruct access to the front of many houses on the High Street.  There are no proposals to obstruct any properties on the High Street.
Purple Route - Phase 2 Village In general Pilot Street is very narrow and needs some traffic calming and is dangerous for road users especially in holiday season. Large commercial and farm vehicles use this route. Could a priority system / traffic lights be installed?  Whilst traffic lights would not work in this area, there could be the possibility of a priority system and/or further traffic calming measures. This will need to be discussed with the Road Safety Traffic Department. 
Purple Route - Phase 2 Village Pedestrian access through the village centre is restricted by the lack of suitable infrastructure. In addition, the lack of signage for alternative routes within the village doesn’t make these easy to find.  Noted; improvements to signage would be part of the scheme.
Purple Route - Phase 2 Village Residents on the High Street do not have the benefit of off-road parking and must therefore stop outside their homes to load and unload. The proposal doesn’t appear to consider this. We are utilising space within the highway to provide a betterment; the ad-hoc parking for loading/unloading will not be impacted and cannot be guaranteed.
Purple Route - Phase 2 Village As a resident of the High Street, the position of the priority flow appears to be directly in front of our house. Firstly, we wouldn't be unable to continue to park our car here - this would mean yet another car looking for scarce roadside parking in the village. It would also cause issues with access - at times we would have no choice but to pull up outside and that would create chaos with the 'controlled traffic flow. The final design has not yet been confirmed, and all comments will be considered.
Purple Route - Phase 2 Village The village route needs the same surface levels of road and footpath for many reasons, not raised footpaths and give ways. Any improvements will be assessed with the village aesthetic in mind.
Purple Route - Phase 2 Village If the Emergency services needed to stop on the High Street there would be no access for any other vehicles to pass as the High Street with paving either side would only allow 2133.6mm approximately and an ambulance width is 2080mm. Where existing narrowing's are, we would consider installing infrastructure in a manner which could be provide a shared space. 
Purple Route - Phase 2 Village Some properties are Listed Buildings along High Street, parts to which cannot be paved over. Any areas that have listed building status will not be paved over, any final designs would take this into account.
General This will change character of village to its detriment. The Shared Use Path is not likely to change the character of the village but enhance the available infrastructure for those who wish to walk and cycle.
General The proposal will lower the value of houses as it will be taking parking away so people will not want to buy them.  The on-street parking is being retained; not removed.
General The most pressing issue is the lack of a safe active travel route between St Dogmaels and Cardigan. This is the route that would link to local educational establishments, services, shops, the Cardigan Health Hub etc. It is also the route used for National Cycle Network Route 82 and the Wales Coastal Path. The demand is huge compared with journeys between St Dogmaels and Poppit Sands (local population approximately 50). There is already an established Right of Way alongside the river between St Dogmaels and Cardigan, but this is under water when the tide comes in. What is needed is a timber boardwalk with a steel sub-structure similar to that currently under construction along a part of the Carlingford Lough Greenway at Newry, Northern Ireland. An elevated boardwalk (above high tide level) would allow wildlife such as otters to gain access to the shoreline. The proposals introduce a boardwalk along the existing route which will form part of a wider strategic route to Poppit Sands. The on-street route along the St Dogmaels Road into Cardigan is an existing route which is suitable for those riders who feel confident. At present there are no plans to look for a connection to Cardigan within this scheme, however, it could be considered as a potential scheme in the future. 
General How can you reduce car dependency in a rural village miles from peoples work over, an hour to the nearest hospital, ambulances are basically non available and up to two miles from a butcher, baker, main store and with an ageing population? The provision of a safe, secure, Shared Use Path may encourage those users who wish to undertake smaller journeys in and around the village, or to Poppit Sands, by Active Travel mode - rather than vehicle. The scheme is not designed to replace the vehicle or to prohibit those who wish to travel by vehicle for longer distances from doing so. It is about providing options for those shorter journeys that can be undertaken by walking or wheeling.
General Local businesses will lose out by reducing parking on the High Street. The on-street parking is being retained.

 

 

November 2024 update:

The consultation period has now ended. The results of the on-line survey are currently being analysed along with the feedback obtained at the public consultation day which took place on the 21st October 2024. This webpage will be updated in due course confirming if the proposals will be taken forward.

Public consultation on the proposed St Dogmaels Active Travel and Connectivity Improvements 

Pembrokeshire County Councils Transport Strategy Team invite you to take part in this on-line survey which aims to gather feedback from members of the public and commuters on the following:

  • Creation of an approximately 645 metre Shared Use Path along High Street, Feidr Fawr and Pilot Street (B4546). A Shared Use Path is a route which is designed to accommodate the movement of pedestrians and cyclists. (Purple Route).
  • Creation of an approximately 460 metre Shared Use Path connecting Feidr Fach footway with a new Shared Use Path and a counter lever boardwalk onto Pilot Street. (Red Route)

 

St Dogmaels Improvements Phase 1: village centre & boardwalk

St Dogmaels Improvements Phase 2: alternative routes

St. Dogmaels to Poppit Sand improvements

St. Dogmaels to Poppit Sand improvements 2

St Dogmaels draft plans

 

Why are we proposing these changes? 

St. Dogmaels is one of the more popular tourist destinations within Pembrokeshire with locals and visitors visiting the Pembrokeshire Coastal Path. The village has grown around its historic routes and is characterised by narrow roads, often with limited footways for pedestrians. Parking is a challenge, with most residents parking on street or in limited parking areas through the village. This can lead to additional pressures on the network in terms of traffic flow and pinch-points additionally pedestrian movements throughout the village are constrained by a lack of sufficient infrastructure.

The aim of the proposal is to:

  • Create a safe Active Travel Link between St Dogmaels and Poppit Sands
  • Improve road safety for pedestrians and cyclists
  • Encourage socially inclusive active travel for all types of journeys including tourism and leisure
  • Reduce the levels of car dependency, reducing carbon footprint, pollution and congestion
  • Improve the environment, health and social wellbeing of the community

Public consultation

The Public Consultation will commence with a workshop/drop-in session on 21st October 2024, between 10:00 – 12:00, 13:00 – 16:00 and 18:30 – 20:00 at the St Dogmaels Memorial Hall. 

The sessions will have representatives from Pembrokeshire County Council to answer any questions that may arise. Following this one-day event, for those who are unable to attend in person, an online public survey will be made available and can be accessed, via: Have Your Say

The online survey will remain available for 4 weeks concluding on 18th November 2024 at midnight.

Whilst the County Council encourages consultation responses to be made via our on-line consultation system, paper hardcopies of the designs and survey, along with a comments box, will be located in County Hall, your Local County Councillor will also have a copy of the plans. Posted copies are available upon request by contacting the team on the below email address or contact number. 

Following on from the consultation period, final preferred option(s) will be identified. This preferred option will not be finalised until we have the feedback from the local community.

Please contact the team at majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk or telephone 01437 76455 if you have any questions. 

This on-line survey will close on the 18th November 2024 at midnight. Thank you for your time in completing this survey. 

 

ID: 12130, revised 25/06/2025
Print

Saundersfoot Active Travel Improvements

May 2025 Update:

The online survey results have now been analysed, the report can be found in the below link. If you have any questions please contact the team at majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk

Saundersfoot Active Travel Consultation

April 2025 update:

Following the public consultation process that concluded in November 2024, all comments received have been compiled into the table below, along with the Council's responses for ease of reference. We trust that this addresses the concerns raised; however, should you require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact the team via email. As from 8th April 8 free 30 minuite parking bays will be implemented on the Harbour.

Discussions are currently ongoing with the Authority's Engineering Team, the Local Councillor, and relevant stakeholders to determine which elements of the scheme will be taken forward subject to funding. This webpage will be updated accordingly. 

The key themes addressed are as follows:

Category

Key themes (you said)

Council response (we said)
Cycling No one would cycle up Bevelin Hall as its too steep. Gradients along the route have been assessed and while they do fall outside what is standard within Active Travel Guidance, there is allowance to develop routes which can be used as Shared Use Paths regardless. It may be that few cyclists utilise this route, however, there is scope for the improvement to benefit pedestrians and other users.
Cycling The standards quoted for the scheme appear to recommending a 5.5m wide highway as a minimum also a 2.0m minimum for footpaths. The design standard says that cycle paths should not be included in such a width if there are alternate or parallel routes. The scheme has been designed in adherence to Active Travel Guidance, which states that design standards are met and applied, as a minimum, unless there are particular reasons for local variation. Where the Shared Use Path and or highway width has dropped, we have undertaken the mitigation needed as necessary. Alternative routes are not suitable due to traffic volumes, gradient and/or desire line.
Parking  The new kerbs installed at Harbour Court are too high outside of The Arcade by the bus stop and people are parking in the disabled spaces. The kerbing outside of the Arcade has been designed to enable bus passengers to alight more easily and for wheelchair accessible users to be able to utilise the ramp. This area is not recommended as a parking zone.
Parking The loss of parking spaces will have an impact on businesses and drive people away from town. Dispersing vehicles through the town to residential roads will cause local residents parking issues and access issues for emergency vehicles. From feedback received, Cambrian Terrace Traffic Regulation Orders are to be retained; this will not result in a loss of parking. 2 disabled bays, a loading bay and short stay parking bays have now been retained.
Parking Disabled Parking - parking bays have been removed or relocated for disabled users. How will this be addressed? Dedicated Parking bays for disabled users have been provided within Cambrian Terrace (2 bays). Two additional bays have been provided by the Bus Stop on Milford Street, near to the arcade. Additionally, the Harbour will be installing an additional 6 disabled parking bays adjacent to The Strand end of the development.
Parking Enforcement - There is a perceived lack of enforcement of the existing issues (parking in Tesco loading bay/zig-zags). Can monitoring be carried out to assess who is parking in disabled bays? Could 'blips' be installed to stop parking? Enforcement regularly visits Saundersfoot and issues tickets. It would not be appropriate to 'monitor' who is parking in disabled bays for Data Protection purposes.  Yellow Blips can be considered for areas where regular parking occurs on double yellow lines are occurring (i.e. near the school).
Parking Loading Bays - businesses require nearby loading facilities for heavy goods; Cambrian Terrace has Heavy Goods Vehicles parking on the footways, how will the businesses be served with the café culture? The loading on Cambrian Terrace is to be retained. This, along with other loading bays, could be flexible use or have timed restrictions to make the bays available for short term parking throughout the day, subject to statutory consultation. The Hean area is currently being considered within a further study for enhancements to the junction and infrastructure.
Parking Could a park and ride scheme based in the market area near New Hedges Roundabout be considered? This is not part of the scope of this scheme.
Pedestrian Stammers Road - There is no need to remove the signalised crossings. The signalised crossing has been removed and a toucan crossing provided closer to Old Stammers Road. With the implementation of the Shared Use Path, narrowing the road carriageway down to 5m, and the zebra crossing at the roundabout, the existing signal crossing in this location is no longer required. The removal will allow for increased parking in this area.
Pedestrian The Ridgeway into the village - the footway is very narrow with no provisions for people with wheelchairs / pushchairs could this be improved. Improvements onto The Ridgeway are currently being assessed under a separate study.
Pedestrian The Strand - Can a footway be installed on the other side of the road? Due to the narrow nature of The Strand, there is no scope to include a footway on the south side and retain two-way traffic.
Pedestrian The siting of the zebra crossing on the north end of Cambrian Terrace on a virtually blind bend is dangerous. Traffic comes down the High Street at speed and unless there is some form of traffic calming then I believe there would be an increased danger to pedestrians. The raised zebra crossing at this location will slow traffic turning into Cambrian Terrace. Advanced signage, along all approaches, will warn drivers of the new junction layout. Speeding is regulated by the posted sign and within the built environment limited to 20mph. Perception of vehicle speed has not been evidenced, however any observations of speeding and/or inappropriate driving should be referred to the police for enforcement. 
Shared Use Path Could the route of the Shared Use Path go via Milford Street - High Street - The Strand? The gradient along Milford Street and High Street would prohibit the attractiveness of the route for many users. The proposed route is along the most appropriate gradient available within the area and along the desire line for many users.
Shared Use Path Please don't forget runners too - we run this route sometimes but it's dangerous on the sections that have no pavement. Runners are able to utilise the Shared Use Path along with walkers, wheelers and cyclists.
Shared Use Path The existing path through the tunnels, connecting the car park to The Strand, was sufficient for connecting Coppet Hall to the village centre, therefore, another route does not need to be created at the detriment of car travel.  Unfortunately, the Coastal Route to Wiseman's Bridge can become blocked and there is no alternative available for pedestrians and cyclists. The proposed Shared Use Path along Frances Road will provide a safe, secure route for walkers, wheelers and cyclists between the two locations. The Shared Use Path in this location will be behind the existing hedgerow, where possible, and there will be no narrowing of the carriageway along the route.
Shared Use Path Will reducing the carriageway to 5mtrs in some places be too narrow for two-way traffic? The scheme has been produced in line with guidance from Manual for Streets and Design Manual for Roads and Bridges.
Shared Use Path Is it safe to have pedestrians and cyclists to have a shared space, especially on a downhill gradient were cyclists will be at speed. Should the cyclists use the carriageway in this instance?  Cyclists are still entitled to utilise the carriageway if they so choose. 
Shared Use Path Sandyhill Road into the Village - The current paths are sufficient for the demand. Noted.
Shared Use Path  The gradient of Stammers Hill means that pedestrian/mobility scooter users of the pavement should not share these with cyclists. The gradient means that even freewheeling cyclists descending the hill travel at speeds comparable to cars, so should remain on the road. Respect is required by all users of various modes; shared facilities are shared. Additional signage 'Care share' can be implemented along the route.
Street Furniture Cambrian Terrace - Could the bollards be removed in the winter to create additional parking / loading / unloading areas? No, bollards are only used to police where injudicious parking has previously occurred.
Street Furniture Coppet Hall - Can the kissing gates be retained? Yes.
Street Furniture  Cambrian Terrace - Can the bollards be made lockable with access given to businesses for deliveries? No; this would be difficult to maintain.
Street Furniture Cambrian Terrace - Are the planters to remain in the exact location as they block access to the cellar? All landscaping plans are being reviewed.
Traffic - General The Ridgeway - Traffic speeds in excess of 20mph could traffic calming be installed? Perception of vehicle speed has not been evidenced, however any observations of speeding and/or inappropriate driving should be referred to the police for enforcement.  
Traffic - Genral  Could a be a stop sign at the junction of Wogan Terrace be installed so that traffic would be forced to stop and ensure the crossing is clear and the situation safe to proceed? It would also slow the cyclists down as at the moment they tend to fly through and are a danger to pedestrians on Cambrian Terrace. A stop sign is not the appropriate measure to slow traffic down in this location. 
Traffic - General Coaches and Busses are only just able to negotiate the bend from High Street onto Cambrian Terrace. If the road width is reduced here would make this impossible for the larger coaches to navigate? This will be considered during the design stage and subject to land requirements from third party.
Traffic - General Would a bus / lorry be able to manoeuvre around the new footway on Sandy Hill Road by The Warren? Cars currently park in the layby. Yes, a swept path assessment was carried out in Dec 2024 using a 12mtr and 10mtr long bus and there is adequate space for this manoeuvre.
Traffic - General Deliveries to The Hean and larger Trucks delivering to business down The Strand have to stop on Cambrian Terrace then reverse into The Strand. If the road width is reduced this would have an impact on the ability to deliver safely here? The proposed improvements will not impinge on the current delivery arrangements. 
Traffic - General The highway along Sandy Hill Road is approximately 5.0m to 5.5m now, so it is barely adequate at present; to take a 2m width out of that is dangerous and would hamper the use of council vehicles, the fire service and any builders' deliveries. Etc  The scheme has been designed in adherence to Active Travel Guidance, which states that design standards are met and applied, as a minimum, unless there are particular reasons for local variation. Where the Shared Use Path and or highway width has dropped, we have undertaken the mitigation needed as necessary. Alternative routes are not suitable due to traffic volumes, gradient and/or desire line. 
Traffic - One Way How does the Shared Use Path for cycling work on the Sandy Hill Lane one-way section? The Shared Use Path will not be one way; two way traffic flow will be permitted along this infrastructure. The one way on Sandy Hill Lane applies to the vehicular traffic if the scheme is advanced.
Traffic - One Way St Brides Lane - What are PCC trying to address? Why make it one way?  Safety at the junction at the end of St Brides Lane and Sandy Hill, observations from local residents highlighted that there is a perceived speeding in this junction from drivers. Residents from Sandy Hill were also parking in the junction area. The scheme as proposed, will prevent this action.
Traffic - One Way Will the road be too narrow to accommodate traffic? No; minimum widths have been retained.
Traffic - One Way Will making Sandy Hill Road one way increase speeds and hamper access for the holiday units at Bath Cottages and Plantation Cottages? No; none of the schemes advocate for an increase in speed.
Traffic - Congestion There will be an increase in traffic from the new housing estate - will there be any passing places? Yes, but we are addressing this through active travel links so that the increase in vehicular traffic is limited. The development is providing the Active Travel Shared Use Path within their development
Traffic - Congestion Cambrian Terrace - The amount of zebra crossings proposed will cause congestion in the busy summer months with cars giving way to pedestrians. We are considering this in the detailed design and reviewing in line with the Welsh Transport Strategy Guidance. 
Mini-Roundabout Could a 2nd mini-roundabout be installed on Sandy Hill Road? This can be considered in the detailed design.
Mini-Roundabout Why are you replacing the roundabout that’s already in place?  We are reconfiguring the existing roundabout in order to accommodate the improvements.
Mini-Roundabout The current mini-roundabout at the harbour entrance does not work for vehicles, and would cause further traffic issues. We are reconfiguring the existing roundabout in order to accommodate the improvements.
Café Culture It seems unfair that business are benefitting from café culture when others will have no gain from the proposed changes.  Feedback from discussions with residents and businesses has indicated that the café culture element is not necessarily welcomed in the area at this time.  We have currently considered removing this from the bid.
Café Culture The cafes on Cambrian Terrace have outside seating. This is only used in fine weather and generally in holiday periods. Does this warrant this amount of major disruption and loss of Parking/ Delivery space for the few days where it would get used.  Feedback from discussions with residents and businesses has indicated that the café culture element is not necessarily welcomed in the area at this time.  We have currently considered removing this from the bid.
Café Culture All heavy traffic coming into Saundersfoot comes down Wogan Terrace and the High Street and meets at the junction of Cambrian Terrace, meaning that any customers of outside restaurants located here would have to tolerate the emissions from larger vehicles. Feedback from discussions with residents and businesses has indicated that the café culture element is not necessarily welcomed in the area at this time.  We have currently considered removing this from the bid.

 

 

November 2024 update:

The consultation period has now ended. The results of the on-line survey are currently being analysed along with the feedback obtained at the public consultation day which took place on the 14th November 2024. This webpage will be updated in due course confirming if the proposals will be taken forward. 

Public Consultation:

Pembrokeshire County Councils Transport Strategy Team invite you to take part in this on-line survey which aims to gather feedback from members of the public and commuters on the following:

  • Stammers Road: Provide a Shared Use Path between Saundersfoot Harbour and Stammers Road. A Shared Use Path is a route which is designed to accommodate the movement of pedestrians and cyclists.
  • Sandy Hill Road: Provide a Shared Use Path providing a direct connection between Saudersfoot and the A478
  • Frances Road: Creating a Shared Use Path linking Coppet Hall Beach with Saundersfoot Village

 

Strategic Corridor Penally to Saundersfoot

Stammers Road Active Travel Scheme

Stammers Road Active Travel Scheme Cambrian Place

Frances Road Active Travel Scheme Coppet Hall

Sandy Hill Road Active Travel Scheme St Bride’s Lane

Frances Road Active Travel Scheme

Sandy Hill Road Active Travel Scheme

Stammers Road Active Travel Scheme Old Stammers

 

Why are we proposing these changes?

Pembrokeshire County Council feel that there is an opportunity to provide missing and safer links within the current active travel network that provides connectivity for local residents and visitors which will tie in well with the existing provisions already available. Some of the current routes, particularly along Sandy Hill Road are unsafe for walking, cycling and people with mobility issues, it is our aim to create a safer environment for all and to encourage people to travel without the use of their vehicles. We would like to create a strategic route that enables traveling in and around Saundersfoot without the use of a vehicle; thereby reducing congestion, parking and traffic pressures. Encouraging this behaviour change will not only lead to a healthier lifestyle but it will also be a greener and cheaper way to travel.

The aim of the proposals is to:

  • Improve safety of the active travel network
  • Encourage socially inclusive active travel for all types of journeys including tourism, leisure, school and work.
  • Create a safer environment for cyclists, pedestrians and people with mobility issues.
  • Enhance accessibility for cyclists, pedestrians and people with mobility issues

Public Consultation

We will be seeking your feedback on the proposals within the schemes, either throughout the entire route or in your particular area, as well as any suggestions you may have on further infrastructure needs to improve cycling/walking and accessibility improvements. 

The Public Consultation will commence with a workshop/drop-in session on 19th November 2024, between 10:00 – 12:00, 13:00 – 16:00 and 18:30 – 20:00 at The Coal Building, Saundersfoot Harbour.

The sessions will have representatives from Pembrokeshire County Council, to answer any questions that may arise. Following this one-day event, for those who are unable to attend in person, an online public survey will be made available and can be accessed, via Have Your Say

The online survey will remain available for 4 weeks concluding on 17th December 2024. 

Whilst the County Council encourages consultation responses to be made via our on-line consultation system, paper copies of the designs and survey, along with a comments box, will be located at The Coal Building, Saundersfoot Harbour and County Hall. The printed version and paper surveys will remain in place until 17th  December 2024, where they will be collected. Posted copies are available upon request by contacting the team on the below email address or contact number.

Following on from the consultation period, final preferred option(s) will be identified. This preferred option will not be finalised until we have the feedback from the local community.

Please contact the team at majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk or telephone 01437 76455 if you have any questions. 

This on-line survey will close on the 17th December 2024 at midnight. Thank you for your time in completing this survey. 

ID: 12144, revised 01/05/2025
Print

Narberth Active Travel Improvements

April 2025 Update:

Following the public consultation process that concluded in September 2024, all comments received have been compiled into the table below, along with the Council's responses for ease of reference. We trust that this addresses the concerns raised; however, should you require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact the team via email.

Discussions are currently ongoing with the Authority's Engineering Team, the Local Councillor, and relevant stakeholders to determine which elements of the scheme will be taken forward subject to funding. This webpage will be updated accordingly.

The key themes addressed are as follows:

Category

Key Themes  (You Said)

Council Response  (We said)
Parking The proposal does not help people who are disabled or have mobility issues, more on-street parking is needed so that I am able to use my car for shopping.  Shared Use Paths can help disabled people travel independently for everyday journeys, leisure activities, and access to community resources, promoting social inclusion and reducing isolation. They are well-surfaced, continuous, and protected from motor traffic, making them safer and more accessible for people with disabilities, including those who use wheelchairs, mobility aids, or have visual or hearing impairments. Having adequate on-street parking is essential for many people, especially for those who rely on their vehicles for shopping. The current proposal does not introduce any additional parking within the town, however, should the proposal to divert Heavy Good Vehicles go ahead this will elevate the congestion making accessibility easier. 
Parking Parking enforcement is required for drivers who park on the double yellow lines at the bottom of St James Street, as it creates obstructions to large vehicles.  Enforcement Officers are regularly in Narberth, your concerns will be passed to the relevant department to identify if improving enforcement in that area is required. 
Parking The residential parking along the road in Templeton will also cause congestion, together with the high volume of traffic at peak Holliday times.  Residential parking can lead to increased congestion; unfortunately, this is an issue that is common across Pembrokeshire. Any final decisions regarding the Heavy Good Vehicle diversion will include an assessment of traffic management.
Congestion Narberth has become increasingly congested, particularly in the summer months, due to a rise in visitors. Additionally, the growing number of new housing developments is contributing to the increase in vehicles within the town. Narberth, a town that was built hundreds of years ago, was not designed to accommodate the volume of cars it faces today. Constant pedestrian crossings on the High Street are causing traffic tailbacks. While the town’s popularity is a positive sign of its appeal, it does present significant challenges in terms of traffic flow and infrastructure capacity, especially during peak periods. The combination of increased visitor numbers and ongoing residential development is placing additional pressure on a road network that was never intended to support such volumes. It’s important that we begin exploring sustainable solutions that balance the needs of residents, businesses, and visitors, while preserving the unique character of the town.
Multi-User Path The new paths would primarily serve as leisure facilities, rather than commuter routes or routes for schoolchildren. The unpredictable weather and the lack of preparedness for biking to work make them unsuitable for daily commuting. Surveys have been conducted within the school to promote Active Travel and raise awareness about the importance of making sustainable transport choices, whether for leisure or commuting purposes. Creating a safe and supportive environment is key to encouraging behaviour change for all users. 
Multi-User Path The footpath coming into Kiln Park Road is too narrow.  The existing footways are substandard by Active Travel Guidance. While the existing footway would remain, the proposed Shared Use Path would be away from the carriageway on the internal side of the hedgerow.
Multi-User Path If there was a cycle path from Princes Gate to Narberth then I’d walk/ cycle more but the roads are too dangerous for that. Narberth is already a busy town so I don’t think we need to encourage more cyclists to it. Further improvement schemes for Active Travel could be explored to encourage more people to choose sustainable modes of transport, such as walking, wheeling, or cycling, over driving. This shift would not only promote healthier lifestyles but also help reduce congestion within the town, leading to less traffic and a more sustainable, accessible environment for everyone.
Multi-User Path Will this Multi - User Path allow equestrian access? Yes, a multi-user route is designed to accommodate various modes of non-motorized travel, including pedestrians, wheeling, cyclists, and horse riders, offering a shared space for active transportation. 
Multi-User Path Hardly any children cycle to school and those that use scooters already have sufficient space on the existing pavement. Surveys have been conducted within the school to promote Active Travel and raise awareness about the importance of making sustainable transport choices, creating a safe and supportive environment is key to encouraging behaviour change for students and parents. While the existing pathway may have enough space for scooters and bikes, officially designating it as a shared-use path would legally allow cycling. This formal recognition would provide clearer guidance for users, ensuring safer and more efficient use of the path for both cyclists and pedestrians.
Multi-User Path In regard to the Narberth to Haverfordwest multi-user path, have you considered designating the on-road sections of this route as Quiet Lanes in accordance with Highway Code rule 218? The on-road sections of the proposed route for the Haverfordwest multi-user route are currently being assessed to see if they meet the designation for Quiet Lanes (Highway Code Rule 218). Sustrans are currently carrying out this assessment on behalf of the Authority. 
Multi-User Path Pursuing the landowners of Slebech Park to allow their access road to be used as a cycle way would a good way of segregating cycle traffic from the A40 between Canaston Bridge. (Please note they already have a permitted footpath which runs on part of this access road.) My proposal is to link the existing Slebech Park to Blackpool Mill bridleway (which is a level wide gravel track) to this drive at OS grid reference SN 032141 (near Slebech old church). The new cycle route to run on the tarmac drive until it exits the estate at GR SN 016144 the route could then follow the C Class roads into Haverfordwest via The Rhos, Creamston eventually entering Haverfordwest via the Uzmaston Road. The biggest initial cost will be the cost or terms surrounding the use of the drive. We have held discussions with Slebech Estate and currently, they are not interested in pursuing a Multi-User Route through their estate. We have secured the use of land near Canaston Wood which forms part of the National Resources Wales property; they have agreed that the scheme can use the logging trails as the basis for the multi-user route.  A short section will occur along the A40 on the verge, to which the South Wales Trunk Road Agency have provided an in-principle agreement. Then the scheme joins back onto the C-Class Roads via The Rhos and Creamston into Haverfordwest.  
Multi-User Path The western pavement on Kiln Park Road, is not 'narrow and often overgrown with vegetation'. It is excellent and was fought for by residents for decades and is highly valued both by residents and by people walking the 'triangle' of Kiln Park Road, Station Road and Jesse Road for exercise. None of these people will want to share this pavement space with cyclists. The proposals is not to share the existing footway with cyclists, but rather to provide an alternative Shared Use Path which connects to the Rail Station and Jesse Road. There is no intention to remove the existing footway.
Multi-User Path I think there are plenty of cycle routes around Narberth and beyond that could be improved but most are fine the way they are however, I am all for improving access for people with mobility needs. I doubt many people will want to cycle from Narberth to Haverfordwest and back when it can be done a lot quicker in a car or by bus. These improvements will encourage a few more cyclists but not enough to justify the work being done. The benefits of Active Travel may not always be the quickest option, but encouraging a shift to walking, wheeling, and cycling is one of the most cost-effective ways to reduce transport emissions, decrease congestion, and lower air and noise pollution. The multi-user route would also provide some much-needed additional infrastructure for horse riders. To assess the impact of these initiatives, monitoring would be carried out upon completion to collect data on the number of users, helping to inform future improvements and ensure the success of the scheme.
Multi-User Path Putting the new footway behind the hedge would mean that residents of Kiln Park Road could not access it. Where would they be expected to join it? There would need to be regular access points opposite each and every house on the road, so that they could safely access it. The location of the access points into the Shared Use Path would be worked out in design detail. However, it is common to have access points at either end and one in the middle for most people to utilise the closest point. We would not provide a dedicated access for each residential property.
Multi-User Path If the road width is narrowed it will be dangerous.  The road will be designed to Manual for Streets Standards.
Multi-User Path The roads around Narberth are already filled with cyclists, joggers etc. People have managed without these connections and they will continue to manage without. The creation of a Shared Use Path and Multi-User Route aims to provide safe connections to key destinations, ensuring that people have convenient and accessible options for travel. This initiative allows individuals to travel more safely and sustainably, offering a greener alternative to traditional transport options.
Multi-User Path I don’t feel that putting the multi use path hidden behind the hedgerow is helpful at a time where it’s less safe than ever for women and girls to be out walking alone. What will happen to the existing bus stop and how will children continue to catch the school bus from Kiln Park Road? There are no plans to remove the existing footway or bus stop from Kiln Road; it will operate as normal. The proposed Shared Use Path is about providing a safer, segregated route away from traffic to encourage modal shift for those users who may not be confident, walking, wheeling or cycling by live traffic.
Pedestrian The existing footpaths are sufficient, there isn't a need to turn them into Shared Use Paths.  Cycling on footpaths is not generally permitted; by officially designating it as a shared-use path it would legally allow cycling. This formal recognition would provide clearer guidance for users, ensuring safer and more efficient use of the path for both cyclists and pedestrians.
Pedestrian Not many cyclists use Kiln Park Road.  If a safe Shared Use Path were in place, it could encourage more people to cycle in the area. Currently, there is no provision for cycling off the carriageway, which may discourage individuals from choosing cycling as a viable option.
Pedestrian There is 'intermittent footway' on the Eastern side of Kiln Park Road, most of the land referred to in this proposal is privately owned by the homeowners. Even though it may look public, the land is inside their legal property boundaries, so there is just a tiny stretch of pavement opposite the bus stop near the turn for Station Approach. So, the only viable pavement is on the western side oh Kiln Park Road.  There is no intention to provide any works on the eastern side of Kiln Park. The works are proposed to the western side, behind the hedgerow.
Pedestrian Stop narrowing the roads around Narberth and pushing pedestrian orientated works. Roads are used for business and travel and must not be downgraded to allow for projects dressed up as “active travel” “net zero” targets or for safety. There is no intention to narrow the carriageways around Narberth within this proposal. The improvements along Jesse Road have provided additional footways and realigned the carriageway, without narrowing the live carriageway.  
Pedestrian I use the current walkways every day maybe the drainage and lighting could be improved. Noted, this can be investigated. 
Pedestrian Town Moor car park is currently very dangerous for pedestrians particularly on busy days. It needs a dedicated safe path. The Town Moor car park pedestrian route can be investigated. We will pass this along to the appropriate team.
Pedestrian I would like more countryside footpaths in the Princes Gate/Tavernspite area. The road is already too dangerous to walk on due to the current heavy good vehicles/tractors and so adding more to this area will be even more dangerous. It would be great to have a footpath route that linked to the existing footpath network to enable those living between Princes Gate and Tavernspite the ability to walk to Narberth. For us being able to get to our local town of Narberth is far more beneficial than a cycle path to Haverfordwest. Noted, this can be investigated as a separate future scheme subject to funding. 
Pedestrian As an elderly retired resident of Kiln Park Road, I am very concerned about what will happen to the current footpath, which I use regularly. How will I access a path behind the hedge? To walk into town and to access the bus stop (for service and school buses) and rail station the footpath is necessary. Hiding the cycle/footpath from view behind the hedge may be detrimental to the security and confidence of users. The location of the access points into the Shared Use Path would be worked out in design detail. However, it is common to have access points at either end and one in the middle for most people to utilise the closest point. Segregation from the live carriageway enables cyclists who are less confident to have a safe space in which to ride. 
Pedestrian If the footpath is removed, children will need to walk along the road (which is part of the heavy goods vehicles diversion) to catch their school bus. This is totally unsafe, which was one of the reasons the footpath was placed along this road in the first place. If it is to be replaced on the other side of the hedgerow how will pedestrians gain access without walking along the main road?  There is no intention to remove the existing footway, but to provide an additional Shared Use Path on the internal side of the existing hedgerow. The location of the access points into the Shared Use Path would be worked out in design detail. However, it is common to have access points at either end and one in the middle for most people to utilise the closest point. Segregation from the live carriageway enables cyclists who are less confident to have a safe space in which to ride. 
Pedestrian If Kiln Park Road is widened, then a highly visible footpath must remain. Walkers will be in danger if they are hidden behind a hedge. If the road is widened, then the hedge must be removed. Children and young people and the public in general use that path to go to and from school, the station, the park etc and they must not be concealed behind a hedge, especially in the dark, or dusk. Shared Use Paths are often located behind existing hedgerows with access points that are clearly visible to road users through signage and adequate lighting (if necessary). This has been done in other areas of Pembrokeshire without incident and in accordance with Active Travel Guidance and Road Safety Guidance.
Pedestrian Will the existing footpath on western side of Kiln Pak Road (east side of hedge) and also the hedge itself will be retained? The proposal is to retain the existing footway, the existing hedgerow and introduce a new Shared Use Path on the inside of the existing hedgerow.
Pedestrian There is currently no zebra crossing to ensure that children walking to school or pedestrians arriving from the train station can cross the road safely. This should be considered prior to increasing traffic on Kiln Park Road. Final designs have not been drawn up, should the scheme go ahead we will look to see what additional traffic management schemes are required to ensure pedestrian safety when crossing Kiln Park Road.
Jesse Road (Completed) The roundabout is an abomination, it hinders traffic if anything. If you are travelling from Princess Gate to Penblewin via Kiln Park Road with for example a tractor and trailer or a lorry taking that roundabout is an absolute nightmare, I’m counting down the days until we see a rolled vehicle due to the horrendously sharp turn. I myself have cut across the roundabout when the road is clear because it’s far safer doing that. The roundabout has been implemented to slow traffic approaching Narberth and, especially, in close proximity to the school.  Larger vehicles are adequately able to manoeuvre through the arms at the appropriate speed. Section 188 of the Highway Code states that when approaching and entering roundabouts (or mini-roundabouts), all vehicles must pass round the central markings, unless they are too large to do so. 
 Jesse Road (Completed) People still park on the road and pavement due to lack of parking at the school. This can be discussed with the school and our parking enforcement team will be notified.
 Jesse Road (Completed) Jesse Road should be a one car road with double yellow lines to stop cars parking there! This would be so much safer for children walking to and from school. Noted and passed on to our Traffic Department. 
Jesse Road (Completed) The new mini roundabout at Kiln Park corner has destroyed the character of the town. The roundabout has been implemented to slow traffic approaching Narberth and, especially, in close proximity to the school.  The traffic management infrastructure is sufficiently far away from the town core as to have no impact on the character of the town.
 Public Transport Increase public transport, more trains/busses running later, develop existing links rather than building more. The draft Regional Transport Plan has been prepared by the South West Wales Joint Corporate Committee (CJC), a newly established body for Local Government in the region. This plan outlines the strategic management and improvement of the transport network across Carmarthenshire, Neath Port Talbot, Pembrokeshire, and Swansea for the period 2025 - 2030. In conjunction with the Bus Reform and Bus Franchising underway by Welsh Government, the aim is to improve the frequency, coverage and connectivity of all public transport modes.
 Traffic What we need is signage for pedestrians and speed control, particularly on Kiln Park Road, where traffic rarely goes less than 30 mph, quite regularly at more than 40mph. There is a need for more 20mph signage and enforcement. Noted and passed on to our Traffic Department.  
 Traffic As the owner of an agricultural contracting business locally, these recent works have narrowed the carriageway and made it harder to navigate with large vehicles. The adjustment to the kerb west of Eastgate Garage is a plain hazard to motor vehicles and is going to cause an accident. The narrowed section of the carriageway by Eastgate Garage is approximately 40m in length. Adequate forward visibility for vehicles to see oncoming traffic and pedestrian movements in this area meets guidance. It is incumbent upon drivers of all vehicle sizes to take care in narrow areas of the carriageway, where they occur throughout Pembrokeshire.
 Traffic The road through Cold Blow is 20mph, most vehicles travel well above this (including busses, bin trucks and highways vans). We have yet to see any speed monitoring in the village. Noted and passed on to our Traffic Department. 
 Traffic It is good to see a start, but we need to join up all areas to provide non car travel options. The historic roads in our area do not have pavements and we need to consider how we can provide safe pedestrian routes in these areas. One idea might be to expand the one-way system so that space can be given to shared surfaces by making some roads one way for motor vehicles. The layout of Narberth with its many connecting roads could lend itself well to this. Narberth is one the Designated Settlements within Active Travel Guidance and has undergone several key stages of improvements in infrastructure for walking, wheeling and cycling.  The one-way system within the town presents its own issues, however, by encouraging more people to undertake short journeys by other modes, congestion and traffic flows will decrease. The possibility of diverting through traffic and Heavy Goods Vehicles which are not stopping in Narberth via different routes is also being considered.
 Traffic Would you consider putting speed bumps along Kiln Park Road to slow down Heavy goods vehicles? The details of any final scheme have not yet been completed; however, any traffic management which is needed to control speed and retain road safety will be considered during the design phase. 
 Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion Diverting Heavy Goods Vehicles from the town centre will be welcome but it won't solve the traffic problems. These are caused by the failure of vehicles meeting the one-way at Market Street and Jesse Road to filter, leading to gridlock at times of heavy tourist traffic. If the one-way became effectively a large roundabout, with all traffic entering having to give way to the right (like it already has at Moorfield Road), then traffic overload would produce only queues to get on a constantly fluid one-way, rather than the one-way becoming gridlocked like it does at the moment to the detriment of all road users. There are a number of vehicles which travel through Narberth without stopping. The Heavy goods vehicle diversion route would also encourage through traffic to utilise the alternative, thereby decreasing the number of vehicles in town and congestion. Any final decisions regarding the Heavy Good vehicle diversion will include an assessment of traffic management.
 Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion Go Safe Wales have recently designated Kiln Park Road as the fastest in Narberth. It should be 20, but has become a rat run. Almost no drivers adhere to 20. Very few adhere to 30 or 40, and many drivers exceed that. So it would need to have a fixed speed camera, and probably 3 controlled crossing points, as it is a long road with many elderly residents and/or children. The details of any final scheme have not yet been completed; however, any traffic management which is needed to control speed and retain road safety will be considered during the design phase. 
 Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion The routes suggested would need considerable upgrading to take the traffic. The staggered crossroads by 'Canaston Bowl' already has had a number of accidents, so this would need improvement. As would the road from Ludchurch to Templeton. The purple route currently has a railway bridge which is not suitable. Noted.
 Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion Not sure the roads on the route are suitable for heavy good vehicles.  The proposed routes are too narrow and unsuitable. Noted, further work on the scheme needs to be undertaken including traffic flows and preliminary design. The public consultation was to get a high-level opinion as to whether the Heavy Goods Vehicle diversion would be supported in principle by residents.
 Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion Princes Gate and Cold Blow has roads and crossroads that are very tight with houses close to the road, potentially these could get damaged from Heavy Goods Vehicles. Could the wider roads towards Canaston and Bluestone be considered? Noted, we will take this into consideration.
 Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion In Cold Blow there are two points on the road that have a very tight turning circle and Heavy Goods Vehicles have to go over the lane of the oncoming traffic whilst going around a bend. These points are the Princess Gate Bridge and the bend /junction in Cold Blow. A swept path analysis would be carried out to assess the movement of vehicles through a given space, ensuring that designs can accommodate vehicle needs during operation, particularly during turning manoeuvres. 
 Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion The proposed Heavy Goods Vehicle route would bring more and heavier traffic along roads that need to be crossed by users of the Shared User Route or existing bridleways in several locations. To enhance safety, these crossings could potentially be made safer by installing 'Pegasus' crossings. The final designs for the proposed Heavy Good Vehicle scheme have not yet been undertaken; any requirement for additional crossings, and those that could include Pegasus crossing will be considered.
 Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion The A40 is undergoing improvement works at vast expense. The most obvious diversion of traffic to the south of Narberth should be, for traffic coming from the East on the A40 and from the North on A478, to route it from Penblewin to Canaston Bridge and from there south to Cross Hands, thence to Templeton for Tenby bound traffic and to Carew for any Pembroke/Pembroke Dock traffic. This would avoid the built-up areas of Kiln Park Road, Princes Gate, Cold Blow and most of Templeton. Noted, we will take this into consideration.
 Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion The plan to direct Heavy Good Vehicles to Princes Gate will cause increased traffic on what is an increasingly busy road, to have these large vehicles sharing the road with cyclists will be very dangerous.  The road is also used by local farmers who need to able to cross their cattle safely. The road is already very dangerous for this requirement so to add these vehicles would be even more so. The speed at which vehicles currently travel on this road, ignoring speed restrictions and road conditions is alarming. These roads are not suitable for the use of heavy vehicles.  The proposed routes are already used by Heavy good vehicles associated with Prince's Gate and the local quarry. There is additional work to be done on the proposal in terms of routing, mitigation works (any improvements needed), feasibility and preliminary designs. These comments will be taken into consideration.
 Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion The option for Tanners Lane is not a good proposal. The other option whilst offering great benefits for Narberth town centre is not good for the cohesion of Cold Blow and Templeton with more Heavy good vehicles using this route past the school and into the junction on Templeton Hill. This proposal needs to be increased to include better cycleway footpath access along the verge of the A478 as a safe route for these vulnerable road users - this would be a greater benefit for Active Travel. Noted, we will take this into consideration.
Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion The increased heavy traffic will cause emissions into the rural area and the increased noise will be very unwelcome. Princes Gate, Cold Blow and Templeton are built up, rural areas with families who enjoy being able to walk along the road with children and dogs, to have these large vehicles would make this impossible. While the proposals have not yet been designed, traffic surveys will need to be undertaken to determine the existing and potential levels of Heavy Goods Vehicles through the area. Should the final routing option be through Templeton, an assessment of the impact upon the noise level would be considered within that decision.
Heavy Good Vehicles Diversion The playground at Templeton School is adjacent to the road, added fumes will not be good for the children and the speed/noise of the Heavy Goods Vehicles through the villages is dangerous and disruptive. There will be an impact on the ability for parents to access the school safely and unsafe for children waiting to cross the road.  While the proposals have not yet been designed, traffic surveys will need to be undertaken to determine the existing and potential levels of Heavy Goods Vehicles through the area. Should the final routing option be through Templeton, an assessment of the impact upon the school would be considered within that decision.
 General Narberth is a country town and is being turned into a suburban commuter style town. The proposals are in line with guidance from Welsh Government to encourage Active Travel. According to Census 2021 data, the majority of residents either work from home or commute to Haverfordwest, Saundersfoot or St Clears. The designs are in keeping with other improvements provided in a number of villages and towns across Wales.
 General Too much lighting will cause a disruption to wildlife etc, will a new hedge be planted as in picture maintenance?  Lighting levels will be considered during the detailed design phase. An Ecology Assessment will also be undertaken should the scheme go ahead. 
 General The path from Townsmoor is very overgrown, will this be costed in plan? All future bids for funding are required to include maintenance as part of the bidding process.
 General There is already very limited parking in Narberth so any cycling storage would need to ensure that no parking spaces are removed because of it. It is not intended to be placed where parking is. 
 General The path from Town Moor down Carding Mill lane is a great facility. However, it is now getting overgrown by hedges and other growth encroaching from either side. Is there any budget for its maintenance? We will pass this along to the relevant team; however, all future proposals contain funding for maintenance as part of the bidding process.
 General Where would extra cycling storage facilities be placed? This has not yet been decided.

 

November 2024 update:

The consultation period has now ended. The results of the on-line survey are currently being analysed along with the feedback obtained at the public consultation day which took place on the 26th September 2024. This webpage will be updated in due course confirming if the proposals will be taken forward. 

Public consultation on the proposed Narberth Active Travel Improvements. 

Pembrokeshire County Councils Transport Strategy Team invite you to take part in this on-line survey which aims to gather feedback from members of the public and commuters on the following:

  • Improvements to the current Active Travel Network within the town. Active travel is a way of getting around that involves physical activity, such as walking, cycling and wheeling.
  • Creating a 412 metre long Share use Path (SUP) along Kiln Park Road. A shared Use Path is a route which is designed to accommodate the movement of pedestrians and cyclists.
  • Implementing a diversion for through heavy goods vehicles to bypass the town centre, so that local deliveries can be maintained and congestion will ease.
  • Formation of a 6.5mile (10km) long Multi-User Route (MUR) from Narberth to Haverfordwest. A Multi-User Route is a path or trail that is designed for multiple types of users such as pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders.
  • Obtaining feedback on the works that have been carried out to Jesse Road to provide improved pedestrian/cyclist accessibility to and from the primary school.

Why are we proposing these changes?

The proposed route would help to complete the link between Narberth and Haverfordwest (which currently terminates at Blackpool Mill) along a route with moderate gradients to the south of the A40. It currently links into the centre of Narberth via an existing bridleway and will connect into the centre of Haverfordwest with direct linkage to National Cycle Network Route 4 (Celtic Trail). Additionally, recent work by South West Trunk Road Agency (SWTRA) along the A40 has created the provision of a Shared Use Path linking Llanddewi Velfry with Redstone Cross.

The aim of the proposals is to:

  • Provide a high quality direct access between Narberth and Haverfordwest
  • Improve safety of the active travel network
  • Encourage socially inclusive active travel for all types of journeys including tourism, leisure, school and work.
  • Create a safer environment for cyclists and pedestrians
  • Reduce congestion of the town centre

Public consultation

We will be seeking your feedback on the proposals.

The Public consultation will commence with a workshop/drop-in session on 26th of September, between 10:00 – 12:00, 13:00 – 16:00 and 18:30 – 20:00 at Bloomfield House Community Centre. 

The sessions will have representatives from Pembrokeshire County Council, to answer any questions that may arise. Following this one-day event, for those who are unable to attend in person, an online public survey will be made available and can be accessed, via: Have your say 

The online survey will remain available for 6 weeks concluding on 7th November 2024. 

Whilst the County Council encourages consultation responses to be made via our on-line consultation system, paper hardcopies of the designs and survey, along with a comments box, will be located in County Hall. The printed version and paper surveys will remain in place until 7th November 2024, where they will be collected. Posted copies are available upon request by contacting the team on the below email address. 

Following on from the consultation period, final preferred option(s) will be identified. This preferred option will not be finalised until we have the feedback from the local community. 

Should you have any questions regarding the proposed public consultation, please do get in touch via the email address below. 

The proposed plans are available to view on our website and County Hall.

Narberth active travel improvements - Jesse Rd

Naberth to Haverfordwest multi use routes

Kiln Park Road Shared Use Path & HGV routing

 

Please contact the team at majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk or telephone 01437 764551 if you have any questions.

Please feel free to complete the whole of the survey for just the sections that are relevant to you.

This online survey will close on 7th November 2024 at midnight. Thank you for your time in completing this survey.

ID: 12039, revised 23/04/2025
Print

Tenby and Penally Active Travel Improvements

May 2025 Update: 

The online survey results have now been analysed, the report can be found in the below link. If you have any questions please contact the team at majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk

Tenby and Penally Active Travel Consultation Report

April 2025 update:

Following the public consultation process that concluded in November 2024, all comments received have been compiled into the table below, along with the Council's responses for ease of reference. We trust that this addresses the concerns raised; however, should you require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact the team via email. 

Discussions are currently ongoing with the Authority's Engineering Team, the Local Councillor, and relevant stakeholders to determine which elements of the scheme will be taken forward subject to funding. This webpage will be updated accordingly. 

The key themes addressed are as follows:

Category

Key Themes (You Said)

Council Response (We Said)
Parking Tenby cannot afford to lose any parking places or have the roads reduced in width. There is no intention to narrow the carriageways around Tenby within this proposed scheme. The improvements along Marsh Road have provided additional footways and realigned the carriageway. We acknowledge the concerns regarding parking and carriageway widths. Our Engineering Team carefully considers these factors during the development of any highway project to ensure that all impacts are fully assessed. We aim to retain the existing levels of parking and carriageway width. In many cases, parking facilities are increased as part of improvement developments. The aim of the Active Travel upgrade is to enhance provisions for more vulnerable highway users, prioritising their safety and accessibility.
Shared Use Path A link between Marsh Road and The Clicketts would be beneficial, particularly for local people. I am undecided about linking Heywood Lane and The Clicketts, mainly due to the design and functionality. I'm also not sure how much use it would get and whether it would introduce additional road safety issues. Active Travel improvements aim to provide an option for users to choose which mode of travel they prefer to use for their journey. The improvements are developed in line with Highway Design Standards and Active Travel guidance to minimise any potential conflicts.
Shared Use Path There needs to be sufficient crossing points for those with limited mobility to gain access without additional cost being incurred or disruption to locals caused. The scheme is funded by Welsh Government as part of the Active Travel legislation. The Council is obligated, legally, to provide continuous improvements to the existing and future Active Travel infrastructure. Funding comes directly from Active Travel; and cannot be utilised for other schemes.  There is no anticipated cost to local residents. 
Shared Use Path People with mobility issues would be in danger from cyclists. Turning footpaths into multi-user paths increases the hazards for the young and also elderly. Mobility issues are assessed during the scheme development and design. Shared Use Paths are typically 3m in width or up to 4.5m with higher volumes of pedestrian/cyclist movement.  All users are expected to behave respectfully towards other modes and users.
Shared Use Path I do not agree with putting an Active Travel path through a housing estate. Shared Use Paths play an important role in providing an accessible route for people to walk, wheel, and cycle for many different trip purposes. Accessibility within local neighbourhoods is key, and where quieter routes, such as residential roads can be used due to lower volumes of traffic and speed; they are considered.
Shared Use Path Part of the proposed cycle path includes The Glebe Hill adjacent to St Johns Hill. On many occasions over the years I have had to assist people using a mobility scooter who cannot make the 13% incline if not more up the hill. This is no easy walk. When cyclists use the hill they snake from side to side to make the steep lower, this makes it impossible to walk up or down the hill at the same time. While gradients are considered in the design, Active Travel guidance does allow for local departures from standards based upon local geography. Having said that, where possible, there is another route that could  be considered which can be investigated. Currently we are also considering St John's Hill via Rectory Court to Merlin's Court, as an alternative.
Cycling The current cycle route number 4 passes right through Kiln Park which is not ideal. The entrance to the path behind Gulf Garage Petrol Station is often totally blocked by new static caravans awaiting positioning. Also, there are many small children playing on scooters and skateboards in this area enjoying their holiday. The National Cycle Network Route 4 utilises the existing route through Kiln Park in order to remove users from the busier Highway Network (A4139) where there are currently no facilities. We can liaise with the Managers at Kiln Park in regards to retaining the access and avoiding blockages. 
Cycling Cycle paths should be on main roads not through housing estates on pavements directly in front of homes and only when there is sufficient room.  Shared Use Paths are designed to find safer routes for walkers, wheelers and cyclists away from heavy traffic flow. This can at times include residential roads, country lanes and  quiet lanes. Opportunities to cycle through rural areas and Towns need connectivity links in order to transition between the two; Active Travel should be accessible for everyone, regardless of location. Often residential areas are considered as an Active Travel link allowing users to access the facility directly and confidently, capturing users from their doorstep on a comfortable and user-friendly route.
Pedestrian There are no proposals to link New Hedges to Tenby schools along the main road. How are we meant to walk our children to school? There needs to be a safe and wide enough footpath between New Hedges and Heywood Lane schools. In a few years my children will be attending Bro Preseli via bus and there is no safe footpath for them to access the bus stop on Narberth Road. It is disappointing that this has not been considered, especially with Bryn Hir housing development in the pipeline. The missing link of footway between New Hedges and the Park House Nursing Home has been raised previously and has been incorporated with part of a current planning application to provide this link. The current proposals would provide a quieter route, away from traffic, along Slippery Back which would connect into The Glebe, St John's Hill and onto Heywood Lane. Beyond the Park House Nursing Home, there is a footway connecting into Sepentine Hill already, should you choose to walk that route. Within the Bryn Hir Planning application there is also a requirement to provide Shared Use Path that links to National Cycle Network Route 4 and a crossing point on the A487 to facilitate safe crossing.
Pedestrian The changes at The Croft and Gas Lane could be useful, but the need to The Green seems very low. There is a need for a route into Town along The Norton as many people walk that way to and from the doctors and hospital. The volume of traffic along The Norton and the existing infrastructure does not lend themselves to utilising this route for a Shared Use Path. As such, this route was dismissed from further consideration.
Pedestrian There is a lack of pavements around the Leisure Centre which is very well used. There is an existing footway along the A4139 in front of the Leisure Centre. The current proposals include provision of a Shared Use Path along The Clicketts, Heywood Lane and Marsh Road to facilitate Active Travel.
Public Transport Transferring the bus route from the village core to the by-pass improves village pedestrian safety (no footpaths) and air pollution. Noted.
Public Transport People with mobility issues will have difficulty with accessibility to anything in Tenby. If there was a town bus service, I think that would improve accessibility all round and link into the wider public transport network. The forthcoming Bus Reform and Franchising is currently looking into the needs for improved service, frequency and connectivity within the South West Region.  A Tenby Town Bus may be considered within this scheme. 
Traffic Reducing the speed limit to 30mph for the by-pass section adjacent to Penally Rail Station will improve pedestrian safety. Noted and passed on to our Traffic Team. 
Traffic The Croft to The Green would turn St Johns Hill back into a two-way traffic system which never worked before and was changed because it was so dangerous. The Shared Use Path improvement applies to walking, wheeling and cycling traffic flows which would be two- way. The proposals are not seeking to alter the one-way vehicular traffic flow.
Traffic Cyclists that travel at 30mph plus should not mix with pedestrians. The speed limit is 20mph, cars do not adhere to it and cyclists certainly will not. Cyclists are expected to adhere to the Highway Code and behave respectfully when mixing with other modes. The same applies to vehicles; driving the speed limit and adhering to the 20MPH is the law.
Traffic Tenby often has poor pavement capacity, and few effective road measures to cope with high volume car use, e.g. speeds of 30mph plus in the 20mph, distributor roads like the Narberth Road and The Norton. The historical nature of Tenby, as with other locations within Pembrokeshire, restrict the existing infrastructure and further improvements. The population of Tenby with visitors provides a seasonal tidal increase in traffic flows. This will need to be addressed through other means, such as improved bus facilities, improved rail connections, improved Active Travel links in order to reduce vehicle numbers and reduce congestion.
Slippery Back It's very difficult to assess whether large amounts of public funds should be spent when there's no indication of the level of need. Currently, when I walk my dog up Slippery Back, I rarely pass anyone else. Naturally with the new housing development there is likely to be more people walking the route. The proposed route along Slippery Back provides a connection from New Hedges into Tenby, away from the A478. The route is popular with many residents and visitors in the area and the formation of a Shared Use Path may enable those in the area with the opportunity to travel via walking, wheeling or cycling.
Slippery Back I use Slippery Back to access the Cemetery sometimes and I have always walked all around the lanes including Blind Mans Lane to exercise my dogs. Will it really be possible to purchase private land to change the route? Discussions with landowners are underway; the final route choice option will depend on whether third-party land discussion are successful. As such, we have developed options for consideration.
Glebe to Green The proposed changes will have a large impact to many residents on The Glebe as there is a high demand for parking, not just for residents but for early morning swimmers visiting the beach. Local children use the narrow access road to get to the playground, increasing the traffic along this narrow lane will likely result in accidents.  On-street parking levels are to be retained as current, the initial option developed considered that each driveway access position would not to be available for on- street parking due to blocking access, therefore development of the Active Travel connection is currently considered to have minimal effect along this section of highway. There has also been consideration for traffic calming within the developed arrangement to address traffic speeds and conflict with children playing. 
Glebe to Green The route will remove homeowners parking when parking is a priority in The Glebe. It will also be dangerous for children to play outside their homes if a cycle way is introduced in a residential estate. There are no proposals to remove homeowners parking, the on-street parking is to be retained as current. The minor realignment of the footway opposite the potential Shared Use Path would be to Active Travel standard width requirements, the carriageway amended to a width suitable for a housing estate. Suitable signage could be erected asking cyclists to dismount in busy areas where children play.
Glebe to Green While the intention behind introducing cycle lanes and accessible routes might be to promote greener, healthier transportation alternatives, the specific context of The Glebe, suggests that such an intervention could disrupt the delicate balance of community space, safety, and historical resident privileges. Any such changes need a thorough, participatory approach involving all stakeholders to ensure that the solution doesn't end up being more detrimental than beneficial. The current proposals are in preliminary design, all comments will be taken into consideration before making any further decision as to this section of the route. We appreciate the importance of preserving the character and function of local communities, particularly in areas with historical significance and long-established resident needs. We are fully committed to engaging with local stakeholders throughout the process to ensure that any changes are sensitive to the unique context of the area. Maintaining community space, ensuring safety, and respecting resident access and amenities are key priorities in the design and consultation process.
Glebe to Green The route through The Glebe seems unnecessary and will displace existing parking provision for residents with no alternative offered. The alleyway adjacent the pub is extremely steep and greatly limits the options for those with mobility needs. The means to provide those options then become very expensive. The Merlin’s Court route is the obvious best option and compliments the Slippery Back and North Beach car park routes. It may improve to access to where public transport services are located but the actual services provided is a much bigger discussion. While gradients are considered in the design, Active Travel guidance does allow for local departures from standards based upon local geography.  Having said that, where possible, there is another route that could be considered we will investigate this option. Currently we are also considering St John's Hill via Rectory Court to Merlin's Court, as an alternative.
Glebe to Green Many of the householders along the affected section of the estate have had alterations made to the front of their houses to facilitate accessible entrances and vehicles, the proposals do not appear to reflect this. Meanwhile, the Travel Route construction seems to include widening one side of pavement to meet the route requirements, narrowing the opposite side and thereby creating a gap between road and former pavement. The road is of concrete construction and finish, so a challenge to materials that can be used satisfactorily. Finally, the proposed use of the slope going down from the estate to St John’s Hill appears to increase risk of collisions between pedestrians and bicycles.  On-street parking levels are to be retained as current, the initial option developed considered that each driveway access position would not to be available for on- street parking due to blocking access. The minor realignment of the footway opposite the potential Shared Use Path would be to Active Travel standard width requirements, the carriageway amended to a width suitable for a housing estate. Comments are noted regarding concrete road construction and are already understood as factors by the Engineers and will be taken into account. We understand that the potential for conflicts between pedestrians and cyclists is an important consideration, especially in areas with varying terrain. As part of the design process, our Engineering Team carefully assesses the layout and potential risks to ensure the safety of all users, they closely evaluate the slope's design to explore solutions that can mitigate any risks, such as clear appropriate signage. 
General I'm curious as to what assessment of 'need' has been made within the locality? Have feasibility studies been undertaken? If so, where can the results be viewed? The public consultation element follows on from the initial feasibility study which was undertaken in 2023, traffic surveys which were undertaken in 2024. The public consultation survey results will be published on our website in due course. 
General This proposal completely contradicts the Councils policy of not making unnecessary expenditure due to financial difficulties. The scheme is funded by Welsh Government as part of the Active Travel legislation. The Council is obligated, legally, to provide continuous improvements to the existing and future Active Travel infrastructure. Funding comes directly from the Active Travel Fund, managed by Welsh Government, and cannot be used for any other areas (such as Housing, Education or Highways). 
General There is no requirement for additional accessibility enhancements for individuals with disabilities on the suggested routes, as these routes are often steep and not accommodate those with mobility restrictions.  Detailed design has not yet been undertaken; the final design will consider whether any additional accessibility enhancements are required. Our Accessibility Officer has been involved in the preliminary design discussions and will continue to be consulted throughout the design of the scheme.
General For someone with mobility needs there will be benefit, but not all. They all have steep inclines and could be a safety issue even for able bodied cyclists, particularly in the wet and with leaves covering surfaces. With the current financial situation, the Council struggle to maintain roads/paths clear of leaves. This is not a criticism of the services; it is the reality of the situation. Without knowing the implementation costs it is difficult to say whether I fully support the proposed changes. However, I do like and support the concept of introducing Active Travel routes. Getting them used can be the hard part. Noted. All schemes have been designed with Active Travel guidance in mind to meet criteria. Where gradients are difficult to achieve, alternative routes have been considered. Where there is not alternative, the departure from standard is accepted within local variations.
General There is no requirement for any of them in my opinion. They would be mostly used by visitors in the summer months, and I think what little money we get allocated from the Welsh Government should benefit locals. Sometimes I wish you would ask residents what they need. The Public Consultation process is about obtaining feedback from local residents with regards to potential future schemes. Money allocated for Active Travel cannot be spent on other areas (such as Housing, Education or Highways) and if we did not apply for the funding, it would be spent in other Local Authorities. Feedback from residents is important in determining whether schemes progress and whether alternatives need to be considered in design, routing and or location.

 

 

November 2024 update:

The consultation period has now ended. The results of the on-line survey are currently being analysed along with the feedback obtained at the public consultation day which took place on the 16th October 2024. This webpage will be updated in due course confirming if the proposals will be taken forward.

Public consultation of the proposed Tenby and Penally Active Travel Improvements.

Pembrokeshire County Councils Transport Strategy Team invite you to take part in this on-line survey which aims to gather feedback from members of the public and commuters on the following: 

  • Creation of a 1.66km approximate length Shared Use Path (SUP) from Penally village to Tenby Golf Course. A shared Use Path is a route which is designed to accommodate the movement of pedestrians and cyclists.
  • Creation of  Multi-User Path (MUR) from Clicketts Lane to Heywood Lane, Tenby. A Multi-user path is a path that is designed for multiple types of users, such as pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders.
  • Creation of a 1.08km approximate length Shared Use Path from Marsh Road to Clicketts Lane, Tenby
  • Creation of a Shared-use Path from Slippery Bach to The Croft, Tenby
  • Provide active travel improvements between North Beach car park and The Green via Gas Lane and The Glebe.

 

Penally active travel improvements

Clicketts Lane/Heywood Lane active travel improvements

Strategic Glebe to Green and Croft to Green

Marsh Road multi-use route

Strategic corridor Penally to Saundersfoot

 

Why are we proposing these changes? 

Active travel is a way of getting around that involves physical activity, such as walking, cycling or wheeling.  We would like to create a strategic route that enables traveling from Penally via Tenby and Saundersfoot to Pentlepoir without the use of a vehicle; thereby reducing congestion, parking and traffic pressures. Encouraging this behaviour change will not only lead to a healthier lifestyle but it will also be a greener and cheaper way to travel.

The aim of the proposal is to:

  •  Provide a shared and safe space for all users to be able to commute from Penally to Tenby without using a vehicle
  • Improve safety of the active travel network within the area
  • Encourage socially inclusive active travel for all types of journeys including tourism, leisure, school and work

 

Public consultation

We will be seeking your feedback on the proposed designs. 

The Public Consultation will commence with a workshop/drop-in session on 16th October, between 10:00 – 12:00, 13:00 – 16:00 and 18:30 – 20:00 at The De Valence Pavilion. 

The sessions will have representatives from Pembrokeshire County Council, to answer any questions that may arise. Following this one-day event, for those who are unable to attend in person, an online public survey will be made available and can be accessed, via: Have your say 

The online survey will remain available for 4 weeks, concluding on 13th November 2024.  

Whilst the County Council encourages consultation responses to be made via our on-line consultation system, paper hardcopies of the designs and survey, along with a comments box, will be located in County Hall and The De Valance Pavilion. The printed version and paper surveys will remain in place until 13th November 2024, where they will be collected. Posted copies are available upon request by contacting the team on the below email address or contact number.

Please contact the team at majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk or telephone 01437 76455 if you have any questions. 

 

ID: 12040, revised 01/05/2025
Print

Prendergast one-way

April 2025 update:

Following the public consultation process that concluded in October 2024, all comments received have been compiled into the table below, along with the Council's responses for ease of reference. We trust that this addresses the concerns raised; however, should you require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact the team via majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk.

Discussions are currently ongoing with the Authority's Engineering Team, the Local Councillor, Town Council, and relevant stakeholders to determine which elements of the scheme will be taken forward subject to funding. This webpage will be updated accordingly.

The key themes addressed are as follows:

Category

Key themes (You said)

Council response (We said)
Mini roundabout The new roundabout will cause a pinch point; can buses and larger vehicles get through? The scheme has been designed within the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges Standards and can accommodate both buses and larger vehicles safely. A swept path analysis has been undertaken as part of the detailed design, which is now complete.
Mini roundabout The scheme is likely to cause issues with deliveries for local businesses; has the Council thought about this? Vehicle movements and deliveries have been incorporated into the proposed design with provision provided to maintain existing access. No negative impact to access/businesses is anticipated.
Mini Roundabout The roundabout will reduce the flow of traffic and impact businesses. The roundabout will provide a safer traffic flow by calming traffic moving through the junction; it will have no impact on traffic flow and/or business access.
Mini roundabout Why can we not use traffic management instead of a mini-roundabout? The most practical realignment of this junction is in the form of a mini-roundabout; this will improve visibility, narrow the carriageway to provide better crossing points for residents/local users and retain a flow of traffic. The junction layout was suitable when Prendergast Hill/Cardigan Road was the main route out to Cardigan. This is no longer the case and the junction is substandard. 
Mini roundabout Can we use traffic enforcement instead of this scheme? Traffic enforcement has been in place in Prendergast but has not effectively managed illegal parking practices within the area. 
Mini roundabout My driveway is directly off the mini-roundabout, will this be an issue? The design of the roundabout has been adjusted and we have created a dedicated lane access to these properties to alleviate this concern with direct consultation taking place to affected properties.
Parking There is insufficient parking provided within the scheme. The scheme provides an additional level of on-street parking (+40 spaces) that currently does not exist. This is through the formalisation along the route and illegal parking which occurs in the business area. Business' will likely benefit from this formalised arrangement; through adaptation of the existing Traffic Regulation Order.
Parking Parking for businesses is not sufficient; more loading bays are required. As part of the scheme, parking and loading bays would be accommodated within the proposal. This would formalise existing parking.
Parking Can parking be managed through traffic enforcement as existing rather than a new scheme? The use of CCTV and better enforcement would save money. Yes, however the Civil Enforcement Officers cannot be permanently deployed in Prendergast. The proposed scheme has wider benefits. CCTV is not the appropriate mechanism for enforcing inappropriate parking. Currently PCC does not have the power to enforce via automatic number plate recognition.
Parking Can parking be restricted to residents only? If so, what about parking for businesses? The current restrictions provide little opportunity to introduce residents parking. By minimising the road width to accommodate traffic flow in one direction opportunities for on street parking could be increased. 
Parking Parking around school pick-up/drop-off is untenable. What can the Council do to resolve this? Both schools have a school travel plan which they are required to keep updated. This Authority is currently working with both schools to assist in encouraging more students within the area to walk/cycle to the school in order to cut down on private vehicles. 
Parking Can the Archives not be used to provide additional parking? This can be viewed in terms of whether the Archives has sufficient capacity to accommodate flexible parking. Should the one-way scheme be implemented, there would be no need to provide additional parking within the Archives.
Pedestrian Pedestrian Safety is a concern due to the narrow footways and the number of school children walking close to high volumes of traffic. The proposed scheme seeks to widen the existing footways along Prendergast Hill and create a safer environment for pedestrians. This will encourage more students and residents to walk/cycle, which would then impact on lowering the volume of traffic.
Pedestrian  If you remove the signalised crossing, how will this be safer for pedestrians and those with mobility issues? The width of signalised crossing is 7.2m with traffic approaching on both sides. The proposals would see installation of buildouts which would reduce width to 3.2m and ensure full visibility for motorists and pedestrians at these crossing points, raised tables would be utilised at these crossings which would serve to reduce vehicle speeds on approach. The introduction of the one way would also mean traffic would only approach in one direction.
Pedestrian The hill is too steep for cyclists; and they will be in conflict with pedestrians. Children do not pay attention to road safety, so riding on the pavement is a bad idea. Providing a wider shared use path for users to cycle will ensure that adequate and safe facilities are provided. Users of all modes are expected to comply with the Highway Code and be considerate of other users. 
Pedestrian The subway doesn't serve it's purpose, you have to cross 3 busy lanes of traffic to access it. What are you doing to improve this? There are no plans at present to provide any further improvements to the subway.
Pedestrian Why were the old routes between the School and the Archives, Queensway and Prendergast school stopped up? Why can't the Council re-open these? The management of the school drop-off area is unsuitable, and it would also create additional safeguarding issues. Confirmation from the Rights of Way Officer will determine whether a Public Right of Way needs to be preserved at this location.
Public transport Can we improve the bus service through the village to provide additional access and travel options? We can take this away and look at whether there are any options within the near future to improve frequency and travel via bus. Pembrokeshire is currently undergoing the Bus Franchising process and as such may be able to pick this up under that process. 
Public transport If the one way scheme is implemented, there will be no south-bound bus, how will this work? The bus route will head North up to Withybush, turn around at Withybush and then head back down Stepney Terrace to Cardigan Road, where it would then head north. Other stops within a 400m walking distance are available.
School traffic Has the scheme had a road safety audit? Does it meet standards? What about the safety of children? A Safety Audit would be actioned following completion of the Consultation process and further detail design.
School traffic Why can't the traffic for the schools be directed through the main access off the A40 and not through Prendergast? Traffic for the High School is encouraged to utilise the main access on the A40. This is something the school is aware of and this Authority are working with the school on their Travel Plan.
School traffic Taxi's for school children are parking on the double yellows through out Prendergast. This has been passed over to Parking Enforcement to look into; however for loading/unloading purposes and drop-offs this is permitted, which does need to be in line with the Highway Code for a suitable location.
Traffic - General Speeding is an issue through the village, better speed calming measures are needed. The one-way system will make traffic faster. One-Way schemes do not necessarily increase the speed of traffic. The proposal seeks to narrow the carriageway, and with a series of raised tables throughout, will slow traffic through the area. The speed limit is set at 20MPH; this is for drivers to adhere to in accordance with the Highway Code.
Traffic - General Hall Park will become unsafe with the increased volume in traffic and make it impossible for people to pull out of their driveways. The one-way scheme is likely to reduce the flow of south bound traffic along Stepney Terrace for those drivers who use the route as a 'rat-run'; diverted traffic will either utilise A40 Eastern Bypass and/or Sydney Rees Way. There are no proposals to block any driveways within the scheme and/or reduce parking in this area.
Traffic - General The one-way system will simply push more traffic onto Queensway to deliver children to the school. The scheme is proposed to encourage modal shift increasing the number of children who choose to walk/cycle to the schools, where possible. Reduction in traffic along Queensway will be reviewed, along with the potential to open up the pedestrian routes along Cherry Grove.
Traffic - General New signage for speeding, routing is needed. Old signs pointing through Prendergast to get to Cardigan need to be removed; Sat Nav routing needs to be updated. This is something the Council is looking into to take forward as one of the outcomes of this project. We will contact the appropriate Sat Nav providers through the appropriate channels and work with our signage team for further changes. 
Traffic - General There are concerns over increased traffic through Stepney Terrace due to one-way system. It is likely that there would be less traffic with the one-way system implementation, given traffic would likely divert to other routes. This could be a short term consequence until the one-way system beds in and users become aware of the new layout.
Traffic - One way The one way system will stop the Church from holding funeral processions and accessing the Church yard, via Back Lane. It is not appropriate for the hearse to proceed unattended and the pedestrians to use another route. Will a road closure be needed every time? All traffic will be required to follow the one-way system. There will be no use of road closures for funerals, as it is not a requirement.
Traffic - One way Termination of the one-way system is not clear and does not provide a turn-around for vehicles. How will this be addressed?  This Authority will look into this and assess the need for signage or additional room for turning within the scheme.
Traffic - One way The additional traffic forced onto Sydney Rees Way, Morrison's Roundabout and Stepney Terrace will lead to chaos and increased delay.  Traffic delays on Sydney Rees Way is not predicted to rise. 
Traffic - One way How will this affect journey times for all emergency responses? There is no additional journey time for emergency responses given the requirement to clear the way for blue light vehicles. The one way system, and additional parking, would reduce parking and clear blockages on the carriageway. 
Traffic - One way Those living at the northern end of Cardigan Road (B4329) will now have to use the A40 to access the town, adding to journey times. The A40 (Eastern Bypass) is underutilised and has a significant amount of availability capacity to incorporate any additional traffic flow. There is no expected increase in journey time expected for the majority of users.
Traffic - Congestion The one-way system will cause an increase in traffic on Sydney Rees Way, which is already congested at peak times.  Traffic delay on Sydney Rees Way is not predicted to rise significantly which would lead to any junction failures. 
Traffic - Congestion Holds up on Prendergast Way are often due to the traffic lights at Lidl's and by Morrisons'; can these be reviewed?  This Authority has looked at this issue and will continue to monitor and look for future solutions as appropriate. The proposed one-way system would not have an impact upon existing capacity issues as it would reduce traffic onto the Bridgend roundabout by one arm which then improves traffic flow and reduces conflict for delays.
Traffic - Congestion Can there be a route from Prendergast into the A40, Trunk Road? There is currently the Cardigan Road route or Stepney Terrace (via Fishguard Road) which is already in place.
Traffic - Congestion Traffic is related to the school run; this needs to be addressed. The Council is working with both schools to increase walking/cycling where possible and encourage children to undertake active travel in light of this scheme. We are also working with the schools as to traffic management during the school pick-up/drop off to incorporate parking 'hubs' at various locations around town.

 

March 2025

The public consultation for the proposed one-way scheme has generated a lot of feedback, especially regarding parking concerns in Prendergast. The analysis of the survey indicates that while the majority may not support the current proposal, there is clear feedback that local residents are keen on seeing improvements to the highway network, particularly regarding parking issues. The engineering team is collaborating with the transport strategy department to create a new design that addresses these ongoing issues.

The mini-roundabout at the Cardigan road/Stepney terrace/Prendergast junction is moving forward in accordance with the necessary permissions. As this is a highway scheme, this forms part of the Council’s delegated authority to make improvements as part of road safety. The current arrangement no longer satisfies the neighbourhood usage and was suitable when this was the main road to Cardigan. The mini-roundabout will improve traffic flows and visibility in this junction. Works are expected to commence in April 2025.

The results to the survey will be publish on this website in due course.

October 2024

The Prendergast one-way scheme survey is now closed. Thank you for your participation.

We will now be assessing the data and feedback provided. Further updates on the outcome will be provided in a few weeks. 

Public consultation on the proposed Prendergast one-way scheme. 

Pembrokeshire County Councils transport strategy team invite you to take part in this on-line survey which aims to gather feedback from members of the public, commuters and local businesses on the following:

  • Implementing a one-way system through Prendergast

  • Providing a 500 metre Shared Use Path (SUP). A Shared Use Path is a route which is designed to accommodate the movement of pedestrians and cyclists. 

  • Redistributing parking bays and traffic management measures along the B4329 (Prendergast), between Cardigan road / Hall Park road junction and Bridgend square roundabout

Parking on the main road through Prendergast is opportunistic and informal, with quick trips to the local amenities. This results in parking along the shop frontages despite double yellow lines and keep clear markings in front of the retail section. The injudicious parking then causes small delays in the flow of traffic as the route essentially becomes a single carriageway, due to the parked vehicles. 

The aim of the proposal is to:

  • Prioritize the safe passage of school children and the local community

  • Improve traffic flow along the B4329 (Prendergast)

  • Improve parking issues on the main road

  • Improve road safety throughout

  • Reduce congestion and traffic delays

  • Provide clear improvements to the existing cycle and active travel network within the community

 

Public consultation

We will be seeking your feedback on the proposed designs regarding the one-way system and shared use path. 

The public consultation will commence with a workshop/drop-in session on 10th of September, between 10:00 – 12:00, 13:00 – 16:00 and 18:30 – 20:00 at Prendergast archives. 

The sessions will have representatives from Pembrokeshire County Council, to answer any questions that may arise. Following this one-day event, for those who are unable to attend in person, an online public survey will be made available and can be accessed, via: Have your say 

The online survey will remain available for 3 weeks (21 days), concluding on 1st of October. 

Whilst the County Council encourages consultation responses to be made via our on-line consultation system, paper hardcopies of the designs and survey, along with a comments box, will be located in Prendergast archives. The printed version and paper surveys will remain in place until 1st of October 24, where they will be collected. Posted copies are available upon request by contacting the team on the above email address or contact number (located within the letter header).

Prendergast One Way Scheme: Why are Pembrokeshire County Council Proposing This Scheme?

Prendergast One Way Scheme: What are we proposing: Potential Scheme Outputs

Prendergast One Way Scheme: What does the data say?

The proposed plans are available to view, hard copies are also located at Pembrokeshire Archives and County Hall.

Prendergast development one way system and Shared use path facility - overview

Prendergast development one way system & shared use path facility - Insert A & B

Prendergast development one way system & shared use path facility - Insert C & D

Prendergast development one way system & shared use path facility - Insert E & F

Prendergast development one way system & shared use path facility - Insert G

Prendergast development one way system & shared use path facility - Insert H

Prendergast development one way system & shared use path facility - Insert I & J

 

Please contact the team at majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk or telephone 01437 764551 if you have any questions.

 

 

ID: 11988, revised 10/04/2025

Porthgain for all

Resurfacing update 14th April 2025:

On the 14th of April at 23:00 contractors will be installing the final road surface on Llanrhian Road. Due to the nature of the area and the machinery required, a full road closure will not be suitable. The contractors estimate that it will take approximately 90 minutes to complete the surface, which must be done in one continuous process. As such, there will be some disruption and delays to waiting times when entering and exiting the village.

The contractors have assured that they can move their equipment to allow emergency vehicles to pass. However, it is crucial to note that if any of the plant equipment or vehicles cross over the newly laid surface while it is still being installed, it could negatively affect the quality of the materials. This may result in the need to redo the work, leading to additional costs and delays.

We sincerely apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and greatly appreciate the patience and understanding of all residents and visitors during this time.

Thank you for your cooperation.

April 2025 update:

Construction works on site began on 27th January 2025. The resurfacing and drainage improvements to the main car park have now been completed. Work on Llanrhian Road is currently underway and is expected to be completed during the week commencing 14th April 2025, weather permitting.

January 2025 update:

Following on from discussions with Pobol of Porthgain and the Local County Councillor it has been agreed that at this moment in time this Authority will be proceeding with the following elements of the proposed scheme:

  • Resurfacing of the main car park with geotextile and gravel
  • Improve the existing drainage within the main car park area
  • Provide roadside parking along the Llanrhian Road
  • Creation of a pedestrian footway alongside the new roadside parking on Llanrhian Road formed from a mixed grassed seed. This will link in with the Public Right of Way at the existing picnic area allowing safe movement of pedestrians into the village core, without walking alongside the live carriageway

A contractor has been appointed with works to take place in the village week commencing 27th January 2025 with an estimated completion of 6 to 8 weeks, this may vary depending on weather or any unforeseen circumstances arising on site. No works are scheduled in for half term week 24th to 28th February 2025.

All plans and documents supporting the approved planning application can be viewed on the PCNPA website.

If you have any questions in regard to the progress of this project, please email the team at porthgainforall@pembrokeshire.gov.uk

September 2024 update:

Planning consent has been approved by the PCNPA, a copy of the decision notice can be viewed on their website. The next steps will be to commence a forward works programme, including liaising with contractors and determining timings. We will also be liaising with Pobol and providing regular updates; any further communication to local residents can be received through their Pobol Porthgain contact

June 2024 update: 

Final Designs have been established and the project is now heading towards the submission of the planning application. 

February 2024 update:

Public consultation

The consultation period has now ended.  Feedback was obtained on several potential design options, including: layouts proposed, level of parking indicated, landscaping proposals and use of various materials. Pobol Porthgain and the PCNPA indicated that the overall look and feel of Porthgain is important to residents and should be retained.  As such, the options developed were done so sensitively, and with this in mind, so as to not significantly change or alter the overall character, look and feel of the village. 

The public consultation was held on 21st February between 10:00 and 20:00 at The Sloop, Porthgain. Residents and visitors were able to provide feedback on the drawings, and fill in a paper copy of the consultation survey, both on paper on online via the Have Your Say (which remained open until 8th March at 5pm). 

Following on from the consultation period, final preferred option(s) will be identified and will feed into the ‘Masterplan’; this draft version is not yet set in stone and will not be finalised until we have the feedback from the local community. The preferred option(s) are required to be completed by March 2024 in order to feedback to Welsh Government.

January 2024 update:

At present our Transport Strategy Team along with PCNPA have been working closely with the Pobol Porthgain (Pobol) and the Local Councillor, Neil Prior, in order to work towards a resolution to the current parking, congestion and traffic management issues within the village.  PCNPA have called upon the help of The Urbanists, an urban design company focussed on placemaking, to draw up a ‘Masterplan’ based upon comments, feedback and observations provided by the resident of Porthgain.

During a public workshop, held on 24th October 2023, local residents were provided with the opportunity to view the draft masterplan and voice their opinions. Whilst there was mixed views and opinions it was unanimous that retaining the character and charm of the village is imperative. This golden thread will be included during the designing process whilst keeping in mind the type of materials to be used for the visuals of the village.

The relevant surveys of the village and surrounding area have been undertaken. These consist of topographical surveys which gathers data about the natural and man-made features of the land, as well as its terrain. For example, permanent buildings, fences, trees and streams along with the land contours and elevations. Traffic surveys have been taken from 21st September 2023 – 3rd October 2023 in two locations, the C3072 Llanrhian to Porthgain and the Unclassified Road U3066 South East of Portheiddy (Abereiddy), the data collated shows the AM and PM Traffic peaks along with the average vehicle speeds in the village. An Ecological survey has shown that there will not be any significant effect to protected sites or species within the area however, during the project development discussions with the Ecologist will continue regarding the final project footprint.   

We are now combining all of this information into a series of option packages that will be discussed in a future public workshop and for wider public comment within the consultation period.  This is expected to take place in mid-February, and the wider consultation period will run for approximately three weeks. Information will be made available online and within an identified, public location in the village where hard-copies can be accessed. More details will follow on the survey and consultation process in early 2024.

Following on from the consultation period, a final preferred option(s) may be identified and will feed into the ‘Masterplan’; this draft version is not yet set in stone and will not be finalised until we have the feedback from the local community. The preferred option(s) are required to be completed by March 2024, so that we can report back to WG (Welsh Government). 

Regular meetings are being held with PCC, PCNPA, Stakeholders, Steering Board Members and the Welsh Government ensuring that the project remains on track, within budget and compliant.

As always we appreciate all feed back and you can contact the team on the below email address:

porthgainforall@pembrokeshire.gov.uk

Porthgain For All

One of North Pembrokeshire’s popular tourist hotspots, Porthgain has experienced increased congestion and traffic management issues in recent years as a result of the increased visitor numbers who wish to enjoy this beautiful part of our County. This has had a large impact to the existing parking arrangements and traffic management within the village and the access roads leading into Porthgain.

What is the project for?

Porthgain for All seeks to find infrastructure solutions to overcome the pressure on Porthgain, and wider area, as a result of increased visitor numbers and to find improved access solutions to facilities for all users. Parking and traffic management issues are acute in the high season, which is unsustainable, unpleasant and unsafe.

How is this going to be carried out?

A joint working team, between Pembrokeshire County Council (PCC), Pembrokeshire Coast National Park Authority (PCNPA) and Pobol Porthgain has been formed and will seek to undertake a two-stage programme of feasibility and implementation in order to tackle congestion, parking, traffic management and visitor travel via sustainable options to the village.

This Authority has engaged with a local working group, Pobol Porthgain, to ascertain what key issues and objectives they wish to overcome through an engagement workshop, and separately, the PCNPA has engaged a consultant to undertake a 'masterplan' for the village.  Finally, a joint working project examining Coastal Access within the wider Pembrokeshire County, seeks to identify long-term sustainable transport solutions to the coastal areas. 

This 2 year programme will involve feasibility work in Year 1, and include ground investigations, surveys, traffic surveys, public consultations and shortlisting of options. Year 2 will consist of design and implementation of schemes, initial monitoring phases and final inspection. 

The design function for this scheme will be undertaken by internal resources from PCC Engineering & Design team within the Highways Department. The appointment of any additional contractor(s) and supplier(s) to undertake surveys, ground investigations and design work will be in accordance with the procurement policy of the Council.  

A public consultation will be available in Febuary 2024 for all members of the public to have their say. 

How is this being paid for?

Welsh Government’s Brilliant Basics Fund has awarded £248,000 to Pembrokeshire County Council to undertake the two-year scheme, in conjunction with Pembrokeshire Coast National Park Authority and Pobol Porthgain. Further £62,000 in match funding has also been identified.  

When will the project start and when will it be completed?

The project has currently started with background work being undertaken at present. The project has an expected completion date of March 2025. 

If you have any questions please email the team porthgainforall@pembrokeshire.gov.uk

Useful links:

Pembrokeshire County Council Press Releases

ID: 11010, revised 09/04/2025
Print

Major Schemes

Major Funding for Highways and Transportation

Our Transport Team are committed to making traveling around Pembrokeshire as accessible, safe and easy for all users to really benefit from what our beautiful County has to offer. Whether travel consists of commuting to work, shopping, tourism, or visiting friends and family we want to provide a good quality transport network that works for everyone. This is why your feedback is important to us so that we can plan and deliver in a sustainable way.

How are major transport schemes funded?

Pembrokeshire County Council is responsible for a number of transport improvement schemes across the County. Funding is allocated from the Welsh Assembly to help meet the transport objectives set out and to satisfy locally identified priorities, this could include road and footway maintenance schemes or transport and environmental improvements. Each project typically requires a 10% investment from Pembrokeshire County Council in match funding; in some rare cases, the entire project can be funded by Welsh Government.

How are schemes selected for funding?

Schemes are nominated by Local County Councillors, local resident groups or are identified where improvements could be made by Transport Officers. Schemes are then assessed on a priority matrix against: environmental, economic, social benefit, finance and deliverability criteria. Benefits on access to facilities, land use, impact on walking, wheeling and cycling, impact on road users and overall deliverability are also considered. Should the scheme score highly in these areas this Authority would have to go through the WelTAG (Welsh Transport Assessment Guidance) process where options are discussed and assessed based on their scope, benefit, costings and time. Following this, a business case is put together and submitted to Welsh Government which weighs up all the aspects of the proposal ensuring that the costs are in line with the benefits of the project.

What happens next?

The deadline for submission of grant applications for Welsh Government Transport Grant funding in the 25/26 Financial Year was 20th December 2024. It is hoped that award of funding will be made by Welsh Government before the end of March 2025 to enable works to commence on successful schemes and initiatives at the start of the new financial year.  

How can I find out more?

Our on-going schemes are published below:

Haverfordwest PTI

Milford Haven PTI

Saundersfoot Active Travel Schemes

Milford Haven –Steynton to Studdolph Shared Use Path

Tenby – The Croft to Tenby Rail Station

Porthgain for All 

Contact us

For more infomation please email majorschemes@pembrokeshire.gov.uk

Tel: 01437 764551

ID: 10839, revised 21/01/2025
Print

Transport Strategy

Pembrokeshire County Council is the Highway Authority for all local roads (non-trunk roads) within its administrative area. We are also responsible for supporting public transport and community transport services that are not commercially viable. Transport plays a very important role in our daily lives, its availability and accessibility can influence on where we live, work, socialise and the ability to reach out and interact with friends, family and the wider community. Here at Pembrokeshire County Council we aim to ensure that sustainable access, particularly by public transport, walking and cycling, is available to all. 

What is a transport strategy?

A transport strategy signals the future direction of transport and provides the context within with decisions continue to be made. A good public transport strategy brings with it an understanding of the travel needs and aspirations of users and potential users; identifies opportunities and challenges; includes robust objectives; and creates a clear roadmap for how the vision can be delivered.  Pembrokeshire County Council, working with the South West Wales Regional Area, is currently working towards developing a Regional Transport Plan that will serve the needs of residents and visitors to our area.  It is expected that a Regional Transport Plan will support the aims and objectives outlined in the Llwybr Newydd: The Wales Transport Strategy 2021 (opens in a new tab)

Transport encompasses all infrastructure used to enable movement between places. This includes footpaths, cycle paths, roads, rail, digital information boards, signage and transport services (such as rail, bus, taxis, aviation and maritime transport). The wider system encompasses commercial and third sector transport providers and it is the whole system in total which needs to be considered within a transport strategy.

What is the Local Transport Plan?

Transportation planning is the process of looking at the current state of transportation in the region, designing for future transportation needs, and combining all of that with the elements of budgets, goals and policies. The previous Joint Local Transport Plan for South West Wales (opens in a new tab) (2015-2020) was the statutory policy which determined the strategy and programme for transportation and transport infrastructure within Pembrokeshire. The plan provided a consistent policy across the four councils in South West Wales: Carmarthenshire County Council, City and County of Swansea, Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council and Pembrokeshire County Council. This plan is in the process of being rewritten.

 

 

 

 

ID: 10169, revised 03/07/2025
Print

Minor Works Fund

The Minor Works Fund (MWF) offers an opportunity for Town/Community/City Councils and Local Councillors to submit schemes for transport-related highway schemes which are smaller in nature, but require prioritisation to complete the works in a timely manner. The MWF was initially established in 2016, and has an annual budget of approximately £150,000 per annum. Each of the schemes completed to date has been the result of initiation by Local Members, Town/Community/City Councils and developed in conjunction with the Highways Infrastructure Team at Pembrokeshire County Council.

The scheme has proved popular over its duration and has enabled the Council to address smaller, but important schemes, for local areas which can provide tangible results on the ground.

How it works

Once schemes have been initially proposed, they are then assessed by a Highways Engineer based upon a methodological matrix which considers road safety, well-being, user benefits, natural and built environment implications, accessibility, value for money and deliverability.  These are then tabulated to produce an overall score; this score then informs the ranking on the priority list. If a scheme is considered to be over-budget (i.e. greater than the overall total annual budget) to construct – it becomes a named scheme which is then taken forward for consideration within other funding streams (such as Welsh Government Grant Applications) or held on the list for future works (i.e. broken into phases, can be tied into planning development). Scheme prioritisation is updated on a quarterly basis in order to ensure the priority list is current as work is progressed.

Please use our Guidance Document below to find out the requirements for submitting a bid for the MWF, what supporting evidence is required and how to progress your submission further.

If you have an idea for a scheme, but are not sure about the details, please contact minorworksfund@pembrokeshire.gov.uk and one of our team will contact you to discuss your needs further. Please provide as much detail as you are able to about the scheme and we will work with you to determine whether your scheme is viable, and whether it is the right fit for your area and transport related issue to be resolved.

If you already know what you want to do, have supporting evidence, clear plans and have consulted with local residents in your community, please fill in our MWF Application Form.

Minor Works Guidance

Make an application 

ID: 10155, revised 10/12/2024
Print

Community Works Fund

Update: The Community Works Fund is no longer running due to budgetary pressures. If you wish to submit a scheme, please go through our Minor Works Fund process. 

 

 

 

ID: 10164, revised 05/11/2024
Print


Cashless Catering
Cashless Catering
Job Vacancies
Job Vacancies
Bid for a Home
Bid for a Home
Leisure Booking
Leisure Booking
Reserve Book
Reserve Book
My Account
My Account
Pay
Pay
Report
Report
Request
Request